NY Times would not be attacking Biden if he was going to be the Candidate. They have different marching orders.......
Link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ny-times-doubles-down-on-scathing-opinion-pieces-critical-of-biden/ss-BB1izorL?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=f8dca6267fdb4015ebf6d7ba81d5fcfa&ei=13
that should answer your question...better you spend your time coming up with narratives that explain why the GOP has no platform or accomplishments to run on.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
That might be important in the next 4 years
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Anyone who thinks a person of age 81 can manage US, overall the largest country in the world is nuts and is insulting the position of POTUS. But there are not many nuts. Most Biden supporters know he is incapable of fulfilling duty of president. But in order to stop Trump they'd rather put someone who is incapable into white house.
Once again American election is not about electing someone. It is about not electing someone. The quality of the elected certainly is not Biden voters' concern.
(no message)
(no message)
But when their time is up... it's always chaos... which is terrifying.
The good news is that all we need to do is contain Putin and Xi until they pass and leave chaos behind.
Oh! And the same is true for our own would be autocrats.
Having a preplanned succession is the healthiest way to maintain social stbility.
...what's your source of "inspiration" for such creativity?