(no message)
(no message)
routines, and results in damage to persons or property of either the participants or targets of the collective actor. Although most social scientists have an intuitive sense of what constitutes a riot, the edges of the definition are fuzzy and it can be difficult to determine whether or not some events are actually riots. For example, it is agreed that a riot is a collective act. That is, more than one individual must be involved and at least minimally coordinate action in order for a riot to occur. Two people acting together, however, would not constitute a riot, even though it is a collective act of violence. Thus, the lower limit for participation, damage, and duration to define a riot is difficult to establish and has led many sociologists to analyze events more ambiguously referred to as civil disorders or collective violence. For most, however, unless there are at least 30 - 50 people involved, the events last more than a few moments, and there is action that could result in property damage or injury requiring medical attention, a riot has not occurred. Even those events that consensus would label as riots are a diverse lot. The American sociologist's vision of rioting is heavily influenced by the race-related urban riots that occurred in the 1960s, including the infamous Watts 1965,
Link: Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology
(no message)
I mean you can't have a big riot every week........can you?
Feel better?
...these problems. (Soros funds most of the agitators)
George Soros' Open Society Institute viewed the 2015 Baltimore unrest following the death of Freddie Gray as opening a unique opportunity to create accountability for the Baltimore police while aiding activists in reforming the city, according to hacked documents reviewed by Breitbart Jerusalem.
The documents further confirm that the Open Society last year approved $650,000 to invest in technical assistance and support for the groups at the core of the burgeoning #BlackLivesMatter movement.
The information was contained in a detailed 69-page Open Society report on the agenda of an Open Society U.S. Programs board meeting held in New York October 1 to October 2, 2015.
The report directly states the Open Society views the Baltimore unrest last year as a crisis that can be utilized to carry out the organizations agenda.
The document states:
The killing of Freddie Gray in April helped spawn weeks of peaceful protests by Baltimore residents and allies from the #BlackLivesMatter movement that were temporarily interrupted by a period of unrest that lasted less than 48 hours and resulted in some injuries and millions of dollars in property damage to neighborhood businesses. While many lamented the damage done, the overwhelming sentiment is that the uprising has catalyzed a paradigm shift in Baltimore that offers opportunities for major justice reforms.
In particular, recent events offer a unique opportunity to accelerate the dismantling of structural inequality generated and maintained by local law enforcement and to engage residents who have historically been disenfranchised in Baltimore City in shaping and monitoring reform. Building on our existing networks and programs, OSI-Baltimore will focus investments on: 1) creating a culture of accountability for policing in Baltimore, recognizing the pervasive racism, disrespect and lawlessness that gave rise to recent events; and 2) building the capacity of activists in Baltimore to demand and achieve immediate and long-term reforms.
Later on, the document reveals the extent of Soros funding to the Black Lives Matter coalition:
Recognizing the need for strategic assistance, the U.S. Programs Board approved $650,000 in Opportunities Fund support to invest in technical assistance and support for the groups at the core of the burgeoning #BlackLivesMatter movement.
Another section of the document, titled, Report On U.S. Regional Reserves outlines the stated agenda for the $650,000 in funds approved for Black Lives Matter.
#BlackLivesMatter ($650,000) Per Board consensus at our May board meeting, U.S. Programs supported a series of convenings across the country over the summer organized in response to the immediate outrage and the escalating community mobilization to save black lives following the numerous killings of black men, women, and children by police. The largest of these events took place in July, when activists participated in the Movement for Black Lives convening in Cleveland, Ohio. In November, the Funders Collaborative on Youth Organizing will engage younger activists in Durham, North Carolina. In addition to supporting these convenings, US Programs has provided the groups and attendees of the convenings described here with technical assistance.
The investment was well worth it, it seems. A second document on the Open Society U.S. Programs board meeting February 11-12 of this year relates Black Lives Matter worked to influence the 2016 presidential campaign.
That hacked document states:
Leaders of #BlackLivesMatter and The Movement for Black Lives worked to influence candidate platforms during the 2016 primary season. This came alongside the recent acknowledgement by political strategists that African-American voters may be much more pivotal to the 2016 general election than previously forecasted.
The Open Society meeting last year, meanwhile, called for a discussion on whether it would be appropriate for the Soros group to try to shape Black Lives Matter in the future:
The highest profile events, the #BlackLivesMatter convening in Cleveland and the #Law4BlackLives gathering in New York, yielded a promising critique of efforts to date and a potential blueprint for strengthening the movement going forward.
That support calls into question how we might most appropriately support such efforts; specifically whether we should seek to shape the movement as opposed to facilitate its direct action. How do we confront the reality that such movements frequently flail as they attempt to grow and confront the challenges of institutionalizing themselves sufficiently to extend their reach? To what extent do we believe that we should play a role in helping such movement leaders connect with others that might help deepen policy recommendations or connections to sympathetic, but silent, inside actors? How can we help link such movements to existing grantees and other key actors that provide mutual strengthening?
The 2015 document made clear that the funding to Black Lives Matter followed Soros providing funds to the Occupy movement:
Our support of the #BlackLivesMatter movement follows other investments that have taken very different paths, including the Dreamers and Occupy Wall Street. USP grantee United We Dream (UWD) for example, a youth-led organization formed in 2009 by undocumented students and other advocates, changed the narrative about undocumented people and continues to be a major player in the immigration reform field.
(no message)
Charlotte, North Carolina is merely the latest attempt by the Obama Administration to incite a full-blown race war this Fall. The election outcome is far too dire for the Democratic side of the American counterfeit coin to face. They know that Hillary has already lost and that she cannot regain her momentum. Her rapidly failing health, endless political blunders, unrivaled baggage, unprecedented criminal record, and pathological lying constitute an albatross no one could overcome and they know it.
Welcome to Plan B.
Yes, Obama & Company will not leave without a fight as in a HUGE countrywide conflagration. This was always their fallback plan. Nothing scares and unsettles the American people like the specter of race riots throughout the nations major cities. Quite stealthily the chaos and mayhem will permit the Democrats, who already completely control the electoral process and election machinery in those cities to fix the election in Hillarys favor. All the Clintonistas need to do is rig the vote in those major metro areas in all the key swing states. This is why they are literally turning each urban jungle into a war zone, so that they can in turn win those necessary battleground states.
Its no accident of fate that Candidate Clinton just spent some quality time in Charlotte. It was also noted that she was forced to cancel a fundraiser. When does that ever happen? Then a Charlotte police officer out of seemingly nowhere shoots yet another black man without provocation and the whole city blows up. How convenient?! Yes, Clinton absolutely needs North Carolina if she is to win the election.
In fact there is no wiggle room for either candidate during the 2016 presidential election. The only difference between the two, however, is that Team Clinton will do anything within their power to steal the election. They simply refuse to lose and will start race wars to snag a victory on November 8. Therefore, instigating one manufactured crisis after another, which has always been the signature MO of the ruling cabal, is what they (Deep State agents within the political class, international banking cartel, military-industrial complex, national security state, etc.) know how to do best.
SOTN fully acknowledges that the police in America are totally out of control; unless, of course, some of these shootings involve crisis actors which we know some do. Nevertheless, blacks in the inner cities have always been moving targets for reasons beyond the scope of this article. This reality, however, is being quite purposefully blown up in living color during the Summer of Rage as it will be further exacerbated during this Autumn of Riots. There is no question that, when the killings by the police are real, they, too, are being engineered to produce multiple outcomes. There are simply too many COLD-BLOODED MURDERS for these outright acts of police brutality not to be carefully orchestrated as black ops. Yes, the police departments across the USA are actually being mentored to do just that. In fact there are numerous U.S. law enforcement agencies that are now routinely being trained in Israel, as they are being fastidiously programmed to implement the same barbaric tactics that the Israeli police use against the Palestinians in Gaza and the West bank. This inhumane conduct is then exploited by the political party that is in office to maintain their power by exploiting the tensions and conflicts which now predominate throughout American societyparticularly those which concern race, religion, gender, and sexual orientation.
Watch the location of every police shooting and protest between now and the election.
Over the course of the next 8 weeks observe exactly where each killing by a police officer(s) occurs. More importantly, check out where every protest jumps off, or race riot seems to spontaneously occur. You can be sure there is a Soros-funded, Obama-coordinated effort behind each and every one of them.
This whole strategy perfectly reflects the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem Reaction Solution. The Obama-Soros tag team has used these divisive schemes to divide and conquer the citizenry for the past 8 years. Remember, Saul Alinsky, Obamas inspiration as a community organizer in Chicago, utilized the same divide and rule tactics.
There is another insidious piece to this plot to control the main cities of all the critical battleground states. Any city (and state) that does not toe the line according to the dictates of the Clinton campaign can find themselves in a world of hurt. The country has already seen what happened to those who ran afoul with the Obama Administration. First there was Ferguson, then there was Baltimore, and most recently there was Dallas. (See reference articles posted below.) Even the Dallas Morning News has since run a stunning endorsement of Hillary Clinton, their first Democrat in 76 years!
So, the degree of sheer power and profound influence that the Democrats now wield with their Black Lives Matter riot machine is quite daunting and intimidating. When cities like Charlotte can be transformed into a riot-torn war zone in a matter of hours, its clear what the local leaders must do to avoid such an eventuality. Clearly, from now until November 8th, its either Hillarys way or the highway. Thats how compelling an NWO cabal-selected candidate can be; and shes not even in office.
Here we are on September 22nd the first day of Fall facing a season of manufactured protests and engineered riots. This is exactly how TPTB manufacture consent and distract the populace from their unending crime spree. In both instances the real perps operating behind the scenes are actually engaged in a massive social engineering experiment.
Ultimately they plan on stripping Americans of their Second Amendment right to gun ownership, as well as their right to free speech and freedom of religious practice. They actually have a whole laundry list of rights and liberties which they intend on taking away under a Hillary Clinton presidency.
What occurs between now and election day will more than likely be a continuous string and unrelenting spate of October Surprises. They will come in many shapes and sizes, and will all be designed to distract the attention from the class war that has been occurring under the radar since 2008. The wealthy elites know that their time is up. They also know that the markets will soon crash under the weight of so much institutional fraud conducted over the entire history of the Wall Street gambling casino.
The NWO cabal also knows that Main Street USA has finally woken up to the fleecing that they have taken unaware over decades many decades! Which is why they very fastidiously placed a pawn like Barack Hussein Obama into the POTUS position, as they intend(ed) to do with Hillary Rodham Clinton. Incidentally, whenever all three names are used by the MSM, the individual is typically a serial mass murderer or something similar.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Maybe I just think that riots imply a higher minimum violence level.
Protests can get violent.
Not sure why you guys are so fired up about definitions.
members attacked.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
You're either not watching an actual news source and are being fed incorrect information (likely), or you're burying your head in the sand (equally likely).
(no message)
(no message)
It was called a police action. Were you alive then? I'm not baiting you, I'm just curious.
(no message)
What people were calling it seemed immaterial if you were there. There is something about war that brings out a very primitive line of thought, called survival.
I was not thinking about the United States when bullets were missing me. I was thinking I didn't want to die this young.
I was just telling Cole that the term war, although accurate, was politically incorrect. I started teaching in '71. You could have been in one of my
inspiring history classes.
(no message)
the violence and carnage was equal to that of a war. The only difference was that there was no declaration of war. That process should have been followed before committing our troops.
I hope that all is well with you and yours.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)