but Trump turned out to be the one telling the truth. He was clearly against the Iraq War proven in this video released by Neil Cavuto.
Holt "followed up" with return questions for Trump 6 times, but 0 times for Clinton.
Holt "fact checked" Trump 3 times (including the false fact check he tried to pull mentioned above), but not once for Clinton.
Holt asked about the Birther issue in the context of it being racially motivated, he pressed Trump repeatedly for his tax returns, and even finished his questions with this beauty: "Mr Trump. You stated recently that you did not think that Mrs Clinton looked presidential. Mrs Clinton happens to be the first female candidate to ever run for the presidency in this country - a historic achievement. Does your comment refer to the fact that she does not look presidential because she is a woman?"
He may just as well asked Trump when he stopped beating his wife.
In contrast, Holt did not ask Hillary about the Clinton Foundation, her email scandal, her illegal unprotected home server, or Benghazi.
The only reason emails got mentioned at all is because Trump brought it up out of the blue and out of the context of one of his questions.
The bias of the MSM is astounding.
Link: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/27/2003-clip-backs-up-trump-on-iraq-war-opposition.html
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
referred to our Democracy. The USA is a Constitutional Republic, not a Democracy.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
And he interrupted Trump more because he ignored the time limit.
Complaining about the moderator is what people do when their candidate looked like shit. That is why both libs and conservatives were mad at Matt Lauer - both candidates looked like shit in that forum.
Holt is a registered republican. He was hardly biased.
(no message)
(no message)
forcing Trump to fight for time to speak.
(no message)
(no message)
An agenda and are biased
(no message)
(no message)
right for labeling your post a "stupid post" because it is exactly factually that - a stupid post.
that is your modus operandi.
(no message)
(no message)
there was. I don't know of any.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
...Tasty Pakistani Pussy.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Plus Gary Johnson has been saying so many intelligent things lately.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Give me a break....
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)