-Jill McCabe had never run for a thing before
-the same month Hillary's email probe started, she and her FBI-agent husband (Andrew McCabe) met with McAuliffe, and she decided to announce her candidacy for state senate
-McAuliffe's dollars flowed in
-Agent McCabe continued his investigation into Hillary, which was a kid-glove investigation from the very beginning
-Jill McCabe lost to a Republican
-Agent McCabe then assumed an oversight role in the investigation
-no charges were brought, of course.
Get ready for four more years of this shit.
Link: http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-ally-aids-campaign-of-fbi-officials-wife-1477266114
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://youtu.be/r8lf7RLYIww
Several studies showed that Bush won. Get over it.
But I think people are finding it easy to vote for Clinton because her opponent is Donald Trump, To argue that Trump is less corrupt than Hillary would require an extremely narrow definition of corruption, it seems to me.
by definition he can't be more corrupt.
Now, in ignorant bafoonery, there are few people in the country who approach Trump.
To me, the election is a clear choice: Most corrupt candidate ever vs. most childish bafoon ever. Personally, I'll go with the bafoon (if only to vote against the media). I think it is a clear and easy choice to vote against the establishment. But, apparently other people think the corrupt establishment choice is better. I don't understand why they think that, but then, I guess they don't understand why I think it is such a clear choice for Trump.
The man has openly bragged about his enthusiastic manipulation of our corrupt legal, financial, and political system for personal gain. It was the main rationale for his campaign from its beginning...he was going to use his experience in exploiting the system to clean up the system and make America great again...remember?
On the personal level, the man publicly speculated about what a great piece of ass his own daughter would be. Granted, that is more accurately called depravity than corruption, but depravity is definitely a form of corruption.
You are going to have to be much more specific than you ever have been about Hillary's corruption to mount the case that she is more corrupt than Trump (of all people). I know you don't like Hillary, but get a grip. The suggestion is downright silly.
She has an army of civil servants working to keep her out of jail. The State Dept. even hired her own law firm to vet her emails for her. The Dems were contributing to the campaign of the FBI agent investigating her. She assisted 1st Amendment violations by putting a person in jail to cover up the Benghazi idiocy. She has one department trading budget with another (DOS-FBI) to bribe the one department to clear her. She accepts hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign nations and foreign private entities who have decisions pending before her department. Actually, I'm not even sure why I'm typing this. All of this is in the public domain. If you don't know it already, then reading in my post here on UHND will not convince you. Just suffice it to say that I am serious: Trump is small change compared to Hillary when it comes to official corruption.
I don't think there is a single factual statement in your entire diatribe. You must be a loyal Breitbart reader.
Of course these allegations are "in the public domain!" The GOP concocts allegations against the Clintons on a more or less continuous basis. And when neither of them is president, they make up shit about Obama. When you're a Republican, it's what you do.
It is so funny to see you GOPers dancing at the end of your ropes (did you see that Darrell Issa is trying to run on being Obama's best buddy...now, Ned, as a guy who appreciates humor you have to admit that is really funny). After 25 years of running anything you can think of up the flagpole against the Clintons and Obamas, no one outside the right-wing bubble pays any attention to your half-truths and innuendo. In one ear and out the other. At least you didn't re-cycle Whitewater or Vince Foster, and I give you points for that.
Donald Trump has been party to over 3,000 lawsuits...Hillary has been involved in two...both filed against her by the RNC. To my eye, that is a pretty good indication of which one is more corrupt.
Also, your response elides the fact that Trump has based his entire campaign on the premise that he has participated in so much corruption that he can (and will!) turn his experience in banditry to our benefit and make America great again. And many voters actually believe him...including you!
(no message)
Then we can get around to talking about 2020. Woo hoo!
(no message)
(no message)
He had struck out 17 the year before in the 67 WS against Boston.
Mickey Lolich was the difference that WS.
I remember it too well. I met him once at a meeting. I told him how rough it was on a kid to see his Tigers get mowed down. He said, "Well, somebody had to do it." I think he was the best pitcher of his era and there were plenty to compare.
Gibson was the most dominant pitcher I ever saw. Carlton was on that team as well. So was Roger Maris I balee.
All day games WS back then.
I think Haray Caray called the game. At that time he worked for the Cards with Jack Buck before his falling out and heading to Chicago.
1985 was the first year to have all night WS games.
Summer of 64 is an outstanding book.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
completed yet. Game 5 set a WS attendance record, 92000 plus.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)