Manafort and Flynn are whores.
(no message)
It wasn't always this way.
overly burdensome regulations are eliminated and corporate taxes are reduced.... do it!
(no message)
(no message)
they just throw tantrums.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
agenda after lying about it? The bowl is being circled.
Manafort is a distasteful dude IMO - almost as distasteful as Podesta. But the lobbyist business is well known in DC, and this is how the game is played.
And it was 10 years ago. This link didn't become significant until long after Manafort was fired by Trump so he had no reason to be looking for this kind of past when he hired manafort for a completely different job.
If Hill's campaign manager had taken 10 mill from the oligarchs, what would Ned and you have said about that?
He also took the money to promote a murderers agenda.
And he took 12 million from the Ukrainian stooge just recently.
(no message)
(no message)
Looking more and more like Obama appointees are using the resources of the intelligence community to sabotage the Trump presidency.
It's going to be a bitch for the Democrats when Trump does this to their next elected president.
Nothing to sabotage then, yes?
But, if I'm the "Soviets," I would have a lot of chatter about collusion with the each candidate...end every call with "Coordinate this with Jeb Bush" or "Make sure Bernie Sanders understands this." That way, the loser (no matter who it is) can use those intercepted communications (when leaked) against the winner (no matter who it is).
evidence? The fact that they changed the R platform to make it more favorable to Russia isn't evidence? The fact that there is a continuing FBI investigation doesn't mean that there is some reasonable evidence of collusion? You really don't think there was any collusion or knowledge on the part of the campaign on the release of those emails? The Russians just did it on their own?
Also, now you require evidence when you didn't need that email from Obama to believe he wiretapped Trump?
(no message)
(no message)
Link: http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/22/politics/us-officials-info-suggests-trump-associates-may-have-coordinated-with-russians/
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Good job!
(no message)
(no message)
The Bamster himself said there was no link between Trump & the Russians in November after the election. Could he just be lying as usual? Might they be holding back info that hasn't been leaked already? Keep dreaming.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I'll take their credibility over the Orangetan.
It will be interesting to hear what her Deputy AG Sally Yates has to say before the Intel committee next week.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
...one week before the inauguration.
(no message)
you are pathetic.
Seriously?
He would need her approval, and she would get Obama's.
(no message)