You know, the bullshit one that is being pushed by Hannity alone, the human shit stain, despite please from the family. It was always utterly dishonest.
The article below is from RedState.com - not liberal - and came out before the retraction.
Link: http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2017/05/23/fox-news-staff-embarrassed-sean-hannity-pushing-seth-rich-conspiracy/
(no message)
Link: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/opinion-we%E2%80%99re-seth-rich%E2%80%99s-parents-stop-politicizing-our-son%E2%80%99s-murder/ar-BBBsZDX?li=BBnb7Kz
Here is the full statement as posted to Kim Dotcom's website:
"I know that Seth Rich was involved in the DNC leak.
I know this because in late 2014 a person contacted me about helping me to start a branch of the Internet Party in the United States. He called himself Panda. I now know that Panda was Seth Rich.
Panda advised me that he was working on voter analytics tools and other technologies that the Internet Party may find helpful.
I communicated with Panda on a number of topics including corruption and the influence of corporate money in politics.
“He wanted to change that from the inside.”
I was referring to what I knew when I did an interview with Bloomberg in New Zealand in May 2015. In that interview I hinted that Julian Assange and Wikileaks would release information about Hillary Clinton in the upcoming election.
The Rich family has reached out to me to ask that I be sensitive to their loss in my public comments. That request is entirely reasonable.
I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.
If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment."
(no message)
She is the Louise Mensch of the right - both preposterous conspiracy broads, who either have no real sources or are being duped.
They're female Manti Teos.
...and on the take from Rothschilds/Soros.
the Russians "influenced" the election by accurately leaking the Dems dirty laundry from Podesta's email server.
They blasted Hillary with Truth Bombs.
Now, when the MSM does the exact same thing with the Access Holleywood Tape, that is COMPLETELY different - cuz it's domestic "influence"? Riiiiight.
How about, we let all the truth out? I was against Mueller's appointment simply because we already had 3 investigations - one by the FBI over 15 months in the process with NO evidence of wrongdoing. Mueller's appointment was just to get months of public, politically charged anti-Trump TV coverage. But whatever. We have nothing to hide from. Why did you? What's your problem with Wikileaks? They gave the voters accurate and pertinent info that they are entitled to have..
And BTW, the collusion is the least of the President's worries. Obstruction + financial ties to Russia, are the two prongs that will end this Presidency.
(no message)
Dream on. Dream on.
Foreign collusion is not (and is therefore illegal). You can view them the same if you want, but the law views them differently.
Headline news for most of the campaign.
Without the media, the Russian hack and release plot doesn't work.
Am I right?
You have RedState, quoting the DailyBeast, quoting anonymous sources. I didn't realize that is how FoxNews makes its official retractions.
(no message)
(no message)
They pulled an article, but didn't say why. They just said the story is being checked/investigated. Would be interesting if WashPo or NYT would do that occasionally. Maybe they do, and it just never gets noted here, since I'm not trolling their retraction pages.
(no message)
I'm free to think about it, though. It is a burden, I admit.
(no message)
Just kidding. Your post just reminded me of some recent posts when conservatives posted some NY Times articles, and some lefties here were outraged.
(no message)
...Townhall Media.
The website claims it has three goals:
1) Educate conservatives
2) Motivate conservatives to get involved in the political process
3) Activate conservatives through RedState’s support and tools
Redstate called on all far left protesters to BRING FIREARMS to Donald Trump rallies.
This is a new low for the Trump-hating ‘so-called’ Conservative media.
Or one asshole, really.
(no message)
I made that up, just like Hannity and his allies made up his garbage....but how do you know it's not true?!
Why is your conspiracy better than anyone else's?
The two are not comparable, no matter how much you and Hannity try to make them so.
We are now playing by your rules.
I take it that you don't like fake news? Well we don't either. So stop with the fake news stories and we will also.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
...possession of the source of transmission, in other words, proof.
This will be interesting to see what unfolds.
You know no more than I.
(no message)
I'd hate to be a student in your class!
Professor Chris94: "Is she right? 'Cause I know that's the *popular* version of what went on there. And a lot of people like to believe that. I wish I could...."
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I have always found that scene hysterical. I guess I suffered one bad teacher too many.
(no message)
(no message)