I would not to get the booster if you are young and healthy and have already received your 2 shot vaccine as the risks of the vaccine outweigh the benefits against COVID in this group.
This unbelievable bullshit from the Biden Adminis exactly why nobody believes the CDC and FDA anymore.
I posted the reasoning with numbers in previous posts so I won’t waste my time again. Buffoons from the CNN School of Medicine will say what they want, but they don’t know Jack Squat and they know it.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cdc-director-defies-advisory-panel-in-recommending-booster-shot-to-younger-healthy-at-risk-workers
(no message)
"I am surprised that Dr. Walensky overturned one of the four ACIP votes today, and I believe others will be as well," Dr. Yvonne Maldonado, an infectious disease expert on the committee, told The Times. But she agreed the vote was close and didn't begrudge Walensky's decision."
It was a judgement call by Dr. Walensky...one with what I'd call an "abundance of caution"...is it 'harmful'?...IMO...no. So, what's your problem?...the CDC didn't play "brinksmanship" and test how close they could come to failure in controlling the pandemic?...
The only practitioners of "Pandemic Politics" has been Donald Trump, and all those GOP "Leaders" who cower to their mis-informed Base...with no thanks to FOX(News) for pushing against vaccination and mitigation efforts from the CDC...you can take a bow on that score as well.
(no message)
disagreed with Dr. Walensky, but acknowledged the vote was close and understood why she made that decision...she didn't "begrudge" her.
You selectively exclude that part of the FOX article...but not other parts...what "Rule" of yours is that, Baron?...
(no message)
If any scientists change their mind since Covid was identified, it is proof of political interference in science.
Great logic.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
booster shots in the low risk population - whether they had high exposure risk or not.
The risk of dying from COVID when previously fully vaccinated is not greater than the risk of the booster shot in the low risk population.
There is one reason to form these committees. The Biden admin went against the FDA committe in August & backed down. They had Fauci push again in early Sept - he lost and backed away and talked out of the other side of his mouth 2 1/2 weeks later when the CDC panel also concluded it should not be given to low risk populations.. Now the director of the CDC goes against her own advisory panel of their chosen top experts again at the behest of tyhe Biden Admin (there is no other reason to do this).
Your dead wrong on this. Here are the two links. The first embedded with this post is the FDA panel decision story. The following will be the CDC panel's decision.
Walensky is not an expert on this question - they asked the premiere people to decide. Those people said, "no". This is not "changing facts". This is politics.
Link: https://www.westernjournal.com/fda-panel-stages-revolt-biden-admin-pfizer-gives-good-news-vaccine-skeptical-parents/
"Not much "listening to the experts" from BidenHandlers. is there?
Link: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/570057-cdc-panel-says-more-evidence-needed-for-booster-recommendation
How I wish that were such a thing….
(no message)
being in office and you idjits screaming about him killing democracy every day called? And in case you didn't notice, you haven't changed and still hang on Trumps every word. Again, funny and sad all at the same time.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
they have been politicized.
But I feel decently protected already AND i have a slight tinge of concern about the long term effects.
I'm leaning toward waiting a while.
Chalk me up as booster reluctant.
System manipulating drugs
COVID-19 hospital ward without a mask or any other protective gear (and of course, without being vaccinated) and report back to us on how you're doing...maybe even get a few of your like-minded friends to join you, so that we have a more meaningful data set. I seem to recall you advocating 'natural immunity' as the proper path to take.
in the general low risk population- to start, those at highe exposure risk. But the “science” says that the risks outweigh the benefits in that group. This is all political, and it’s killing the vaccination effort.
(no message)
to see that no one is listening to these idiots anymore. It was always about politics and the numbers have been fudged from the beginning. Yes, the Virus exists and it can be dangerous but certain Governors got it right and others killed people. I will always believed this vaccine is a personal choice and once people started to shout from their Ivory Towers about it, others dug their heels in and said "fuck you".
will suddenly advocate for it again. The moronic liberals will say “the facts has changed!”
You need to understand that it is the panel who has the experts. The CDC head is a political appointment, and an administrator. Pfizer stock should jump today…..but deaths will happen that otherwise should not have.