He relegated HIV victims to obscurity, inferior care, and lonely deaths.
He's done it (and doing it) again with the elderly and those with co-morbidities.
He should be fired and prosecuted for lying to Congress. That he still has his a job and morons continue to listen to him is truly frightening.
Link: https://twitter.com/KennedyWRoberts/status/1458072974968463360
(no message)
But when you do, can you offer an explanation for Fauci's conservative warning to stay away from HIV patients, and compare to today's events?
“He relegated HIV victims to obscurity, inferior care, and lonely deaths”.
Except he didn’t moron and expedited new treatments for them.
You are NEVER right about anything.
shows Dr. Fauci revered by his once staunchest critic...all because of what the good Doc did for HIV/AIDS victims.
Link: https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/hiv-covid-19-dr-fauci-his-complicated-relationship-larry-kramer-n1241684
Have you ever said anything that turned out to be wrong? I guess not.
Just curious why your flawed thinking is applied so selectively.
Bush was given false info and acted. He later received “improved” info and changed his tune. You condemn him eternally, but grant Fauci slack. What’s the deal?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
….why dont you just sdmit that your “changing information” argument is stupid?
Fauci says things as fact when they are not.
Changing information doesnt absolve that lie.
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/dec/02/george-bush-iraq-interview
The differences between ordering a war and advising the public ought to be obvious. To most people.
PS - saying "I wish the intelligence had been different, I guess," is not admitting error.
Clinton got the same intel. And Gore would have, had he won in 2000. Only Bush thought it was worth going to war over.
reasoning and your uneven application of it.
Fauci has affected far more lives and caused potentially more deaths from his recommendations, so while certainly different topics, I'm sure you are quite capable of wrapping your mind around the inconsistency of your application of your "information changing" excuse.
(no message)
As that evidence accumulates, the recommendations may change.
The right hates Fauci because he had the temerity to fail to genuflect to Trump. That's the story here.
(no message)
"Finally, the fact that face mask directives have been more effective than either lockdowns or social distancing in controlling the spread of COVID-19 (22, 33) is consistent with indoor airborne transmission as the primary driver of the global pandemic."
If you want to read the entire report (as I have), it's appended. BTW, if you have a report from some reputable source, like the "National Academy of Sciences", that refutes this one, please don't hesitate to share it with us...meanwhile, let's all thank Baron, for not reading the report he posted, yet sharing it with us, so that we got the truth instead of his incredibly mis-leading and made up story.
Link: https://www.pnas.org/content/118/17/e2018995118
Show masks to be completely ineffective. 12 RCTs since WW II, including two specifically regarding Covid. Not to mention nearby Chatham County schools (Savannah) with a mask mandate having consistently a higher Covid rate than neighboring Effingham County, populated with unvaccinated rednecks and no school mask mandates.
When are you guys going to give up the fiction that masks have efficacy in stemming viral transmission?
This issue of "Masking" to protect against airborne pathogens didn't just start with COVID-19...there are numerous reports within the last two decades dealing with every conceivable factor that could be involved...there is no question that masking is effective...just as there is no question that Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin have ZERO impact on COVID-19...the very drugs that you champion...I'll let the readers judge for themselves.
------------------------
Abstract
The science around the use of masks by the public to impede COVID-19 transmission is advancing rapidly. In this narrative review, we develop an analytical framework to examine mask usage, synthesizing the relevant literature to inform multiple areas: population impact, transmission characteristics, source control, wearer protection, sociological considerations, and implementation considerations. A primary route of transmission of COVID-19 is via respiratory particles, and it is known to be transmissible from presymptomatic, paucisymptomatic, and asymptomatic individuals. Reducing disease spread requires two things: limiting contacts of infected individuals via physical distancing and other measures and reducing the transmission probability per contact. The preponderance of evidence indicates that mask wearing reduces transmissibility per contact by reducing transmission of infected respiratory particles in both laboratory and clinical contexts. Public mask wearing is most effective at reducing spread of the virus when compliance is high. Given the current shortages of medical masks, we recommend the adoption of public cloth mask wearing, as an effective form of source control, in conjunction with existing hygiene, distancing, and contact tracing strategies. Because many respiratory particles become smaller due to evaporation, we recommend increasing focus on a previously overlooked aspect of mask usage: mask wearing by infectious people (“source control”) with benefits at the population level, rather than only mask wearing by susceptible people, such as health care workers, with focus on individual outcomes. We recommend that public officials and governments strongly encourage the use of widespread face masks in public, including the use of appropriate regulation.
COVID-19SARS-CoV-2maskspandemic
Policy makers need urgent guidance on the use of masks by the general population as a tool in combating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the respiratory virus that causes COVID-19. Masks have been recommended as a potential tool to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic since the initial outbreak in China (1), although usage during the outbreak varied by time and location (2). Globally, countries are grappling with translating the evidence of public mask wearing to their contexts. These policies are being developed in a complex decision-making environment, with a novel pandemic, rapid generation of new research, and exponential growth in cases and deaths in many regions. There is currently a global shortage of N95/FFP2 respirators and surgical masks for use in hospitals. SIMPLE CLOTH MASKS PRESENT A PRAGMATIC SOLUTION FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC (my emphasis). This has been supported by most health bodies. We present an interdisciplinary narrative review of the literature on the role of face masks in reducing COVID-19 transmission in the community.
-----------------
I've got much more where that came from...as for your evidence, post a link to a peer-reviewed study that asserts masking is of no use...I'd really like to see that.
Link: https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2014564118?utm_source=TrendMD&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Proc_Natl_Acad_Sci_U_S_A_TrendMD_0
(no message)
got carried away and screwed up...it happens...just stop pushing on this rope...it'll never work.
(no message)
CNN medical degree can enlighten us.
(no message)
(no message)
later admit he was wrong? I guess not.