It appears that the burglary victim may have been more upset about him pointing out that her voting decisions have consequences than at the burglars themselves.
Link: https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/SFPD-officer-who-allegedly-blamed-burglaries-on-16635799.php
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The classic example is when those of your ilk claim that any discussion of young women getting blotted-out drunk at a party with young men present is "blaming the victim" for the sexual assault that follows. Either behavior or choices prior to an action should be factored into calculations of the level of victimhood, or they should not. You pick.
The dirtbags who attacked Rittenhouse meant to kill him. In other words, it was a case of attempted murder. How the living dirtbag is escaping some sort of charges should bother everyone. If you've read anything about the history of this character, you unquestionably understand this.
I'm particularly tired of lowlife parents of violent sociopaths sounding righteous indignation publicly when their monstrous progeny finally receive divine justice before our eyes. Scurry away and contemplate how you enabled your sons to continue harming others through inaction or willful ignorance.
Rittenhouse’s predicament has zero to do with the SFPD’s officer’s comment and neither does my comment on his statement.
Conflating events appears to be your only tack in a discussion.
Do better and get help.
the canvas. Canvas Jimmy canvas.
The roommate was getting a bit stale since it's over a year now. Canvas Jimmy has a nice ring.
dismiss you so much.
of this alleged phenomenon. Yes, that is totally insane. Totally. Everyone else is insane but you, Jim.
If he had been found guilty, those three guys would have been the victims. But he was found not guilty, so it turns out he was the victim.
(no message)
There's always a first time!
(no message)
The modern hanged, drawn and quartered.
are fleeing nonetheless.