(no message)
That is the same to you? When you are going for whataboutism, you should at least try to make the two things similar.
With the logic of the Left, I can identify as a 6'5" Asian woman, but I can't identify as vaccinated. Basically, you reinforce my point. 2 + 2 = 5 because you say it is 5. But, 2 + 3 isn't 6 because you haven't announced that it is 6 yet. Thanks for backing up my point.
This is the only path that can clean up brainwashing they had from college.
Yours is the type of antiquated, patriarchal thinking the Left is trying to suppress.
They will re-recgonize 2+2 = 4 at certain age of their life.
The best we get is Jimbasil saying, "Oh yeah? Well...you guys do it too."
If you're not a liberal at 20, you have no heart.
If you're not a conservative at 40, you have no brain.
It is true that age and experience often shed light on unsustainable liberal policies. Some will hopefully grow out of this.
Some can no longer accept simple truths.
(no message)
What will you do next to embarrass yourself?
BTW, while you're at it...check out where the "Blue Left Coast" states rank vs. FLA...
Link: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1109011/coronavirus-covid19-death-rates-us-by-state/
Idjits as Frankie likes to say
Did a better job than DeSantis tells you every thing. I have not seen anything The Linkster has posted but I can only imagine the spin game he is putting on DeSantis.
DeSantis Cuomo. Climate change. Covid policy and treatment. These are all subjects that can be discussed debated and argued...for or against. And I think that's healthy when devoid of childish rancor.
But to be unable to tell folks they are male or female because they "feel" like a 6'2" Asian woman who belongs in first grade is just remarkable. What did the one girl say "who am I to draw boundaries for another person?" Well you can draw a straight line from that to "minor attracted" people.
Alan Turing was cracking the Nazi's Enigma Code and advancing computer theory?...I'm assuming the answer is no, so why can't you "expand" your thinking on such matters and accept that for those 'other people' their perceptions are reality for them...and it is not our task to find ways of antagonizing, or 'culling' them, from everyone else...rather, it's to better understand why those perceptions exist while at the same time treating them with respect as fellow human beings...is that too hard a stretch for you?
His perception of reality was real to him! We have to make moral judgements. The insidious creep of the LGBTQ mafia was never go to stop at gay marriage. Now we're trying to normalize minor attached people. Do me a favor!
interest in harming anyone...if you can abide by males and females choosing to find companionship with each other, as opposed to the 'Biblical', or dare I say 'Catechetical' dictums of behavior, why can't you expand your view on other behaviors on what is clearly a spectrum?
Since these people are not in any way trying to harm others (as opposed to 'Jeff'), what are you so concerned about?...seriously...what is this "insidious creep" leading us to that is so onerous?
People who advocate minor attraction are within that community. They are harbored protected and otherwise normalized within that community. If you think they have purely innocent intent I cannot help you. It is a slow incremental undermining of what is often mocked as family values. Darkness often portrays itself as light.
have a personal challenge with their sexual identity?...sort of like "Rapists" hiding out among all the straight people?...do you have some kind of "Minority Report" means of culling them and putting them away before they can do any harm?...what's the full story here?...what's your "End Game" and means to achieve it?
Please point to where I advocate any of that! Jesus you're a nut job sometimes.
(no message)
we should treat others?
BTW, any comments on the FLA COVID data...after reviewing my responses?...you clearly have the time.
"minor attraction" legitimacy? That pretty much outs you as the type of twisted individual you are. Seek help,and stay away from children for both your sakes
(no message)
(no message)
included this...
"I'm assuming the answer is no, so why can't you "expand" your thinking on such matters and accept that for those 'other people' their perceptions are reality for them...and it is not our task to find ways of antagonizing, or 'culling' them, from everyone else...rather, it's to better understand why those perceptions exist while at the same time treating them with respect as fellow human beings"
Therefore, I ask you...if you agree that "Homosexuality" shouldn't be outlawed, and by extension such individuals should not be discriminated against, then why can't you expand your acceptance to to others who are obviously on a 'spectrum' of sexual perception?...and as I stated above, do you agree that "We" the dominant straight community should not be striving to antagonize them, but rather to understand them while treating them with the respect every human being deserves?
HEY! No Link!!...will wonders never cease ;-).
As vaccinated and my job won’t be able to fire me. Got to start being Woke when I need it and it benefits me.
Think Nancy really wants open in borders in her millionaires compound? No fucking way. But joe six pack better keep his mouth shut or he's a racist.
(no message)