Was anything more predictable than that this #MeToo movement would quickly descend into Salem Witch Trial-type accusations, culminating with the ludicrous case of Aziz Ansari?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
classes.
(no message)
A great mind like yours stifled to teach the products of our public education system? The indignity.
That is still part of your job, isn't it?
Where are you going next, Franklin? "You must like cats?"
The so called education expert who likely still teaches 8th grade civics. Yes you have gone far in your field.
You don’t like it when I call you on it, that’s what all of this is about.
If you can’t control yourself enough to be able to eat with a woman who is not your wife without trying to fuck her, then you maybe you shouldn’t be Vice President.
He is a completely humorless Puritan lunatic.
But he’d be a hundred times better than what we have now.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
They're very rational and sober-minded when it comes to their husbands/partners dining alone with other women.
I could've sworn Robin also argued that most of the guys he sees in these cases are guilty, as well? Sounds like most men really can't control themselves.
Of course, you missed the primary point here: not dining alone with women is a wise thing to do for your own protection, particularly given the current atmosphere (which once again emanates from "lunatics" in the nether regions of our universities), not a protection for women from men who can't control themselves.
You can also probably leave your door unlocked and not have anything stolen, but given what you might lose, it's probably wise to take that precaution.
I'm just glad you didn't regurgitate that asinine feminist argument again that men should not do this because "it will exclude women from power." (chuckling) They probably should have considered that before arguing that women's accusations shall be believed, period, and questioning them amounts to "victim-blaming." They also should have considered that before arguing that we live in a "rape culture," but women should of course be alone with men.
Final point: I've known a whole lot of otherwise decent men who succumb to temptation in the right circumstances. You have to have blinders on not to recognize this.
Pence's policy is wise on at least two counts.
I believe the women in most of these cases, yes.
If you can point to any case where a guy got in trouble for eating dinner with a woman who’s not his wife, the you’d have a point.
You can’t, so you don’t, and neither does Pence. He’s a Puritan. Maybe you admire puritans. I don’t.
So, you believe women basically don't lie in these many cases, but clearly men can control themselves. Interesting.
Uh, Bruce, I just commented on how many otherwise decent men succumb to temptation. There are many cases of men who've succumbed, gone home with a woman, and then accused later on of sexual assault. If you're a married guy, you're especially vulnerable to such accusations.
And I know you don't admire Puritans. You know nothing about them, but the caricature you've been given, and they don't sound like the type of folks who would buy into the harebrained idea that mankind continually progresses, that article of faith to which you subscribe, backed with cherry-picked data to the exclusion of many other data points that are more inconvenient. That whole secular humanist faith thing.
(no message)
(no message)