Seems like the law of averages would have different results. Are poll workers in heavy Dem precincts incompetent? Is there fraud involved?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
You’d think they would have fixed this crap in the last 18 years.
The notion that votes can just be created out of thin air is, however, preposterous.
If legally cast votes are found, then count them. Not complicated.
(no message)
(no message)
“Under #Florida law, county must upload by 7 p.m. day BEFORE election ALL early votes canvassed & tabulated by end of early voting & report results within 30 minutes of polls close. 60 hours after that deadline only 1 of 67 counties is still counting early votes,
According to this alone, the Dem districts and party are breakng the law. Now add in further that the votes can be easily manufactered when there is no voter ID laws to provide a good way to verify that the votes are legitimate.
Are you really racist enough to think that "folks down there just aren't able to run a competent election process"?! Of course they can. But they are cheating.
This should go directly to the SCOTUS. They will take care of it.
(no message)
The Dem Party has adopted this mentality of win at al costs, and they advocate the combination of open borders policies and opposition to voter ID laws in order to gain votes and thus permanent power.
P,S. - I also notice that you don't deny that they are violating the law in Florida. you just cop out by saying, "Their elections are a clusterfuck" which would imply a lack of partisanship when their is one side cheating - extremely.
Take it to the SCOTUS.
The risk when you allow "found" votes is that you may also find votes that were pre-stored in an election machine kept in a closet for just this eventuality. This happened in New Jersey a decade or so ago. That is not unprecedented. And, when the person counting the votes supports the same party as the person who pre-loaded the voting machine, you have a serious problem
About counting legit votes or suppressing them
Got to admit, I like their music. My wife says they aren't proper country, but I don't care. I only get to turn them up when I'm alone in the car. Even my kids hate them.
Nice post
Which has an interesting history with fucking up the vote.
Isnt it amazing that as each hour goes by somehow the democrats are gaining votes?
I agree, talk about a clusterfuck
up votes. Not hard to figure out.
After all, it worked well in 2000 in getting W elected.
(no message)
(no message)
Just remember how Clinton handled the recount in 2000 - love him or hate him, he was a voice of calm reason, and urged everyone to trust the process. He understood that people's faith in democracy was at stake.
Trump today essentially said that the people in south Florida are corrupt and the system is, too.
He is scum.
I love him.
You, that's another story
(no message)
(no message)
I know you dont believe in doing that
It is painfully obvious
(no message)
Russia, Russia, Russia!
Even though that is the IC assessment, and not the figment of Orange’s sick mind like the other shit.
I'm talking about collusion, not FB ads. I'm talking about the stuff upon which the two sides disagree.
The bluring of that line is an anti-Trumper move, though. There is evidence that the Russians tried to influence the election, so Trump should be impeached. But the evidence supporting Russian influence does not support Trump-Russian collusion. The two things are totally separate. But, I see why the anti-Trumpers try to mislead people on that...they don't have the proof on collusion they need.
two things to be true. First Putin admitted they wanted Trump to win. Secondly, we know that they interfered to make that happen.
We have already been through the collusion issues. The Tower meeting itself is clear evidence of it between the campaign and the Russians. Whether Trump knew or conspiracy can be proven are different issues. But there was clear collusion.
Got it.
(no message)
Your analogy batting average remains at a thousand.
(no message)
But, feel free to explain how the difference nullify the analogy.
Or both are just reflections of incompetence in vote counting. I forget.
(no message)
both intereference and some collusion by the Trump campaign.
Hell, Obama himself said he was born in Kenya for his book promotion. Has Trump said himself that he colluded with Russians?
(no message)
it was true.
And Trump pushed it long after it was known that there was zero evidence.
Dunno if Trump personally colluded. But his son and campaign sure did in his name.
(no message)
Including many Trumpo appointees day the Russians fucked with the 2016 election. Your brain must be mush from hearing the witch hunt propaganda so much
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I suppose if he were a reasonably mature personality certain "elements" of his base never would have turned out.
(no message)
You mean he who was advancing the conspiracy theory that Cruz’s father was involved with the JFK assassination.
Ironically, the only conspiracy he doesn’t like is the true one that his campaign conspired with the Russians during the 2016 election.
I mean, Miami-Dade and Broward have suffered for years from some of the worst corruption in the country outside Illinois. The Marlins new stadium is a great case in point.
Trump has said a lot more nuttier things than that.
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.
(no message)
(no message)
They are like peas in a pod
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)