CNN requests local San Diego report on wall, then declines it because it doesn't match CNN narrative
CNN requests KUSI for local view on the border, declines our reporter after finding out wall works
SAN DIEGO (KUSI) – Thursday morning, CNN called the KUSI Newsroom asking if one of our reporters could give them a local view of the debate surrounding the border wall and government shutdown.
KUSI offered our own Dan Plante, who has reported dozens of times on the border, including one story from 2016 that was retweeted by former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich, and posted on DrudgeReport.com. The Border Fence Tour is below.
We believe CNN declined a report from KUSI because we informed them that most Border Patrol Agents we have spoken to told us the barrier does in fact work.
We have continuously been told by Border Patrol Agents that the barrier along the Southern border helps prevent illegal entries, drugs, and weapons from entering the United States, and the numbers prove it.
Link: https://www.kusi.com/cnn-requests-kusi-for-local-view-on-the-border-declines-our-reporter-after-finding-out-wall-works/
Replies to: CNN requests local San Diego report on wall, then declines it because it doesn't match CNN narrative
"We believe CNN declined...."
So they don't know why CNN declined, and neither do you.
It's pretty obvious, isn't it?...
I live in San Diego and I am of the belief that the barrier works. The Border Patrol supports my belief..."We have continuously been told by Border Patrol Agents that the barrier along the Southern border helps prevent illegal entries, drugs, and weapons from entering the United States, and the numbers prove it."
Having said that...I don't believe that a border wall is the "be all end all" that some Trump supporters believe. I do think it's an important piece of border security that a lot of the southern border is missing. In other words, I'm all for what will support the Border Patrol agents in doing their job.
This is the most articulate, rational POV.
Of course, now you're racist, immoral and ineffective.
Only to the cowards that have me on ignore.
(no message)
They certainly deserve the benefit of the doubt.
(no message)
Which one are you talking about?
(no message)
Donna Brazille.
(no message)
Texas Television, a small cable channel operator run by right wing nuts, opined about what again ?
(no message)
Weren’t you the brainiac that predicted a military coup after Mattis resigned?
Or, was it Scooter or the other Jim? It’s hard keeping track of you leftist geniuses.
The Hawk will never die.
(no message)
Don's 'Generals', all gone. Top DOD officials, gone. Fox reporter chosen to oversee military, LOL.
(no message)
Yes, yes, we are supposed to ignore anyone who dares disagree with you. You endorse CNN's goal.
Disagreement is hatred. Mere disagreement warrants disdain. Disagreement is not to be tolerated. People who disagree with you are inherently untrustworthy, because you cannot tolerate challenge...you cannot tolerate competition in the arena of debate, the realm of thought and discourse. Please, continue your attempts to silence the opposition, to suppress freedom.
Meh, CNN has always had an agenda. Doesn’t mean that their reporting is bad, just that you have to
understand the bias.
For example, Fox is obviously biased towards Orange. Doesn’t mean that their news is wrong, just that they are going to put it out in a one sided way.
521 is defending CNN, saying that "Texas Television" (whatever that is) can't be trusted but CNN can
(no message)
And you keep suppressing truth and supporting a foreign asset. You gave up
On this country long ago. Sad
Feds leaked that Trump is a Russian asset as a precursor to how bad this is gonna get.
(no message)
This is good positive news
You are confirming what a wack job you really are
Thank you
Small-timey diversion about a fence is not gonna protect your "President" from his crimes, Ned.
(no message)
This is correct. You can hate CNN and point to their bias. But it doesn’t change the fact that the
truth about Trump and his merry band is coming out.
This is a great point.
Why even report other news?
Where did I say anything like that?
Here’s the point. The MSM despised Nixon, just like FNC and other conservative media despised Bill Clinton. There was clear bias in both instances.
Didn’t change the fact that both ended up being correct in their reporting of what happened.
The bias dog only hunts so far. The facts when uncovered will, ahem, trump that argument.
You just said it again.
What about Fox News?
What are you talking about?
(no message)
This doesn't change the fact that Trump is a treasonous traitor.
Stop changing the subject!
I’m not. 521 did. My point is universal. Just because a source has a bias doesn’t mean it’s wrong.
Texas TV may well be right. So might CNN. In fact they both might.
We focus way to much on denigrating the source rather than looking at the substance. My ORIGINAL point to Neddie by the way.
You agreed with him and continue.
I'll add Trump's alleged crimes to the list of reasons to oppose a border wall. Racism, morallity, ineffectiveness, laissez-faire capitalism, fiscal responsibility, collusion, the Russians and of course treason.
The fence is your fig leaf for continuing to support a criminal.
(no message)
I have never supported Trump.
You live next to a border wall. Hypocrisy.
521 is now stuck in a computing loop. In his mind, there are only 2 sides to this issue.
(no message)
He didn’t cite that as a reason to oppose the wall. I took him to say that this diversion suddenly
to the Wall by Trump isn’t going to save him from what may be coming from Mueller. And of course, he’s 100% correct.
Again, I have no idea what point you are trying to make here.
This is correct.
You are clueless.
about the workings of your muddled thinking....agreed.
(no message)