(no message)
(no message)
First, I asked for a + article from the NYT on Trump, and you give me an article from the WaPo (admittedly just as bad) about Tucker Carlson. No. Do better.
Second, the article is not at all complimentary, as it prefaces it’s begrudging acknowledgement of one of Carlson’s points by describing all of he wrong things (in her weak minded view) about him in general and on the show that day. This is because she knows who her weak minded, snow flake audience is, and she doesn’t want to lose her job or her DC party invitations and social status for saying something good about conservatives.
People who hear things from only one side are poorly educated. That is you and your NYT and WaPo.
Show me a + article about Trump from the NYT. I already pointed out that they would have to write something on an inconsequential topic just to try to give the appearance of being unbiased if they cared anymore. I don’t think that they care anymore.
Even when these hacks at the NYT have to acknowledge something positive about Trump, they feel required to preface it ith the requisite insults necessary to allow them to keep their jobs and not be NYC pariahs.
Polly wants a real cracker....still waiting. A positive article does not contain insults - those are negative. Give me something postive, if you can (and you can't because your fishwrap news source is a biased , unprofessional newspaper).
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)