Now we see that Mueller doesn’t know what is in the report that falsely bears his name, even with time to prepare, and even with being allowed to bring in aides to advise him (unheard of).
Now we see that he Dems were running amok without oversight.
Every single word of that report can have no more reliability than if Hillary Clinton prepared it herself.
Dems, I TOLD you that you would have no credibility without a balanced team.
We now know why Mueller didn’t recuse himself over his link to Comey....he no longer knows the rules. We also know why the Dems wanted Mueller now and why they built him up so much.....they knew they could use his false image to grant themselves credibility while Mueller himself is no longer capable of knowing what is going on.
Bring on William Barr!
PS - we now know also why Barr said 10 days ago that he would support Mueller if he didn’t want to proceed with this....he was being kind to him because he knew.
(no message)
Filings bearing the signature of the HMFIC (e.g. District Attorney or United States Attorney or Department of Justice or corporate counsel or senior partner in a law firm) are typically written by the lawyers under their charge.
But, the HMFIC owns the document, as Mueller proudly does with the Mueller Report.
Note that none of the findings in his report have been refuted or were even attempted to be refuted.
Attack the messenger and/or discount the cyber threat to our democracy, but do so at your own peril.
Continue to masturbate to the misinformation fed by your State TV silo, but do so at your own peril.
Mueller has done more in a day to protect our country than you will do in a lifetime.
I wonder why?
Should have picked a nonpartisan team (but then you wouldn’t have been able to guarantee the result).
Weisman chose the team too by the way.
(no message)
No, you're not a partisan hack. Not at all.
"Not exonerated" means zilch from a criminal case perspective.
But, it means plenty when we we are talking about the President of the United States obstructing and stonewalling an investigation into Russian interference in an election.
This remains lost on you.
Trump didn’t even have a chance to offer defense evidence.
Further, no person is ever found “exonerated”, he/she is found “not guilty” because of lack of evidence which is what Weisman found but wouldn’t give Trump.
Seriously, one has to question your competence that you don’t know this.
If so, then you believe Trump should not be subject to a presumed innocent standard, which means you believe Trump is below the law.
"Not exonerated" to JoeBagofDonuts in rape investigation is meaningless.
I thought it was somewhat chickenshit for Mueller in his report and testimony to not clearly say the obvious: "There is ample evidence to charge Trump with obstruction, but because of DOJ guidance re not charging a sitting president, the path is impeachment."
Mueller middled it by saying jump ball re state of mind, and punted to Congress.
Nevertheless, saying that that a US President is not exonerated on obstruction means that Trump's fitness for office remains open for inquiry.
As the President of the United States, one would expect a US President to fully cooperate in an investigation involving Russian interference in our election and cooperate fully in the obstruction investigation, so that if cleared, the American public and our allies have full confidence in the integrity of the office.
Yet, Trump has not cooperated. Quite the contrary. Read Volume II. Read the transcript of yesterday's hearing.
Ask why Trump and his circle refuse to testify or answer subpoenas. Stonewall, stonewall, stonewall.
Of course, a criminal defense lawyer does not allow his client to be questioned by the authorities, so as not to give them any ammo.
Be happy that Trump has done the same. Teflon Don for President!!! Maintain your high standards for the leader of the free world. Says a ton about you as an American.
If you want to get Trump, do it ethically or you are no better than the person you want to prosecute, or should I say persecute.
I suppose Mueller slept through the legal ethics class where they told him that he should actually vet the 13 partisan Clinton buddies he was told to hire to assure there was no appearance of conflict of interest. Mueller is a sickening pawn in this disgrace of an investigation.
All this “non exonerated” bullshit is political assasination, a silent coup to erase the 2016 election and about as ethical as Weissmann’s railroading of other innocent defendants and putting them in jail and subsequently ordered released because of the unethical actions of a bottom feeding prosecutor. That’s why Weissmann wrote volume 2 because he is a Clinton partisan low life piece of shit.
The “he could be indicted after he leaves office” was also misleading fodder for moronic brain dead Democrats. They forgot to add “if he committed crimes and it could be proven, which we were unable to do”
If the President committed high crimes and misdemeanors, put him on trial in the House, convict him in the Senate or shut the fuck up Democrats.
where in the DOJ guidelines. It is the DOJ prosecutor's job to say whether there is enough evidence to bring charges. Mueller punted on that question.
But, thank you for your post, which confirms what we always knew: the Left has a different standard for Trump. It is happy to treat him differently than every other American.
I am more patriotic, more grounded in the Constitution, than you will ever be.
Link: Watch
(no message)
The focus on the Trump campaign while ignoring the Clinton campaign and DNC tells us the whole Sepcial Counsel team were little but partisan thugs under color of law. They should all end up in jail.
(no message)
(no message)