In a court of law, this is inadmissible hearsay. Nonetheless, I feel that he should identify who provided him the information and then they should have to testify.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
President Dotard just tweets "fake news!" without explaining what exactly he is suggesting is fake.
No one seems to be disputing any of the central points.
July? Who directed the moving of the recording and transcript onto another server and Orange’s involvement with that. The Howard Baker quote applies pretty well here.
(no message)
He does not deny that he talked to the Ukraine leader and told him to get to the bottom of the Biden stuff. He does not deny personally holding up aid (his people deny a connection). He does not deny removing his conversations from the normal process.
Instead he just says he did nothing wrong - not that he didn't do this stuff, only that none of it is bad.
See?
1. He didn’t do it and the fake news media is lying.
2. After 1 is usually proven to be a lie, it then becomes if he did it there isn’t anything wrong with what he did.
3. It then progresses to even if it’s wrong everyone else does the same or similar bad things.
4. The next level is even if everyone else hasn’t done similar, it’s not a crime, thereby it’s okay,
5. The final pitch is if he’s impeached and/or removed the stock market will crash and everyone will lose their 401K money.
Biden meddling in Ukaine's affairs. Self-admitted.
No possible protection for his son?
No conflict of interest?
No political gain?
Bullshit.
Link: https://twitter.com/GOPChairwoman/status/1176872944347353089
and his political gain from doing so.
"If you are too stupid to figure it out, then I am not going to explain it to you." It's code for, when you add up my sketchy, mischaracterized facts, they don't quite make out the point I am trying to make, in addition to exposing how fragile the factual underpinning is in the first place.
GOAT usually doesn't say that sort of thing, but he seems to have gone full Cole recently.
The Biden story is bullshit, utterly and thoroughly discredited.
But Trump and his allies keep talking about it because they know their dumbass followers learn nothing, ever.
Enjoy your leap over the cliff.
He was demanding a corrupt prosecutor be fired. One that DID NOT investigate the company Biden's son was involved with.
This was also the policy of many members of the EU.
It had nothing to do with Hunter Biden. Zip.
This is bullshit.
Biden blatantly admits quid pro quo. Interfering in the legal system of another country. He brags about it.
An investigation is appropriate. Of the Biden boys.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://twitter.com/FredFleitz/status/1177206661603348480
(no message)
(no message)
...who has spent the last decade being a right-wing zealot. Major fear mongering type, working with Frank Gaffney at the CFP. Sees jihadis everywhere.
He made the short-list for National Security Advisor, too. Which should tell you something about this administration.
(no message)
(no message)
Something tells me he has a big bias in this.
Though I do agree, the transcript really shouldn't have been given to the public - Congress yes and they could
work it into dialogue and into the press.