missiles? So this new phone call could be the second time Trump office extorted favors from Ukraine.
We will see.
(no message)
On the request and then suddenly stopped mid investigation. Remember, Ukraine sent accounts with Manafort payments then ceased the investigation claiming they didn’t have jurisdiction. However they suddenly received a shipment of missiles from US. Was there a Quid Pro Quo deal there somewhere?
We’ll see.
(no message)
(no message)
1. Trump's asking the Ukraine president to help Rudy Guiliani dig up dirt on political rival; and
2. A sanctioned Independent Counsel asking the Ukraine to dig up dirt on someone already under sanctioned investigation that is not a political rival.
It will be something like "is it OK to ask the Ukraine to assist in investigating corruption?"
and 2: the Mueller acting in the capacity of the DOJ asking for any data on Manafort from Ukrainian officials during an investigation
insomuch as Manafort was working for Ukrainians and Russia both. This wasn't the DNC or HRC looking into Manafort.
Jim thinks that using an executive office to withhold US aid for personal gain is ok (with Biden), so I assume he opposes impeachment of Trump. He is nothing if not consistent. I don't see him taking a purely partisan position on this.
You guys make it out like this prosecutor was some white knight pursuing Hunter Biden. He wasn’t. The IMF, EU, and State Dept all wanted him out for corruption.
from Ukraine and China. Seriously. There is no legitimate reason you can provide for Hunter to have gotten what he got.
Everyone wanted the prosecutor because that company had other members on their board to protect him. Take a look at the membership. Former president of Poland, former IMF executive, Biden. After Biden got his board membership, one of their board members who had been barred from traveling to the States had his travel bar removed. Amazing how that happens. Was it him or another board member playing golf with both Hunter and Joe in the US? Joe was in on all this stuff. Do some research.
investigating Biden which he wasn't. I know you guys try to avoid that unpleasant fact, but you can’t.
Normally, a statement against one's interest carries weight. Not with you?
He was bragging because he got done what the EU, DOS, and IMF wanted, the firing of a corrupt prosecutor.
You always put the bunny in the hat which, of course, is an old lawyer trick. In other words, you need to show that the guy was investigating Hunter and this is why Biden wanted him fired. He wasn’t. In fact he wasn’t investigating anyone which is why he was fired.
And then he bragged about it in public. The facts are the facts. And they are undisputed, even by Biden.
Again, you know this but purposely ignore it.
Total fabrication on your part - or the BS Jim Jordan line from interview with Jake Tapper. Fucking nuts!
But technically, one was trying to dig up dirt on something not being investigated, and the other was trying to obtain evidence of criminal corruption in an authorized investigation.