I suspect that her bias will permeate this book. I like her because she's a guilty pleasure, but I wouldn't recommend too much of what she does to a conservative.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
two abilities that should be important, but they're not, as long as they make a profit all be damned.
So yeah, you're beach will be coming to you soon.
(no message)
I don't drive an SUV. Never, ever.
Jimbo I might order this book. Every once in a while I can use a good laugh. That’s why I watch CNN and MSNBC. I’ll let you know what I think after I read her dossier.
But she struggles with objectivity.
for most it's almost splitting hairs but it is not - the atmosphere is incorrect
Perhaps one leads to the other, but you are correct. It is clear to me that she is not impartial, and it is harder to tell whether she is objective.
By wrong I mean Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh wrong or Tucker Carlson wrong.
She certainly comes from a perspective that could be deemed harsh by some but welcoming by a great many others. Mostly what I hear from her is her desire to live
in a better nation, a better world. She's bright and articulate. She's active and proactive at the same time which can be off-putting to some.
I find her a breath of fresh air at times though she does prattle on sometimes when 1 minute of discussion is more than adequate but she'' ramble on for 20.
She's definitely a Liberal but in the old school way.
If I were to compare to any one on the right, I'd say she has no match. The right just don't have people who are not willing to lie or spin - she won't do either of them
She's not impartial but has great objectivity in my book.
(no message)
If you ever invited me to a dinner party I would seriously consider suicide.
(no message)