(A long summary to a twisted tail)
Hunter Biden to sit on their board of directors and get paid gobs of money. His dad, the US VP then tells Ukrainian President to shut down the investigation or no more US aide (1 to 2 billion needed dollars).
Investigator is then told to turn off the heat.
Biden admits his role and motivation on camera.
There is an active treaty calling for US and Ukraine to cooperate with each other on prosecuting issues of corruption between the countries.
(No crime by Trump, but definitely reason to investigate Biden’s)
WB rules changed intradepartmentally weeks before a new “complaint” is made so that directly witnessing an event is no longer necessary to make a charge. We now know the WB is a registered Democrat who the IG has since described as having strong partisan leanings toward an opponent of Trump (ie Democrat).
WB went illegally outside of DOJ to lead Dem Trump hater Adam Schiff who referred him to the law firm specifically funded to help with legal matters on the impeachment of Donald Trump (yes there was Soros money and others).
The complaint itself is footnoted and referenced as only a law firm can do.
Schiff lies that he had any contact with the WB, yet Pelosi slips up and mentions she saw it & then backtracks. Also, Pelosi calls for impeachment hearings a day BEFORE the complaint is released.
NYT, which has been the Dem info releasing conduit let’s out info that Schiff did know in order to avoid shock value later during a trial that he was involved ahead of time
(Collusion on formulating and bringing complaint between a hard core Deep State Dems, Adam Schiff, and the MSM)
The Dems want Biden to be immune from investigation because he is now a candidate in 2020, and they choose to look at this as election meddling. That’s right, the same Dems who were spying on the campaign of Donald Trump with the FBI and CIA and using foreign intell resources.
(Libs expect a different set of rules to apply for them)
Dems in House block all GOP from their meetings and committees. After later realizing how bad this looks they allow GOP to sit in on hearing with Volker, but they are not allowed questions, and not allowed to subpoena any of their own witnesses as the Dems are allowed to do.
(Libs stack the deck to determine outcome, and again, they expect to get to operate by a different set of rules than those to which they hold others).
This is the best you’ve got?! The Lib Swamp really IS desperate. Yet they make the same mistakes over and over again.
Karma’s a bitch. Impeach away. You’ve cried wolf too often, and your action betray your lies.
I am sad for you libs who genuinely continue to believe this tripe fed to you by the MSM, but there is no cure for stupidity.
Second, Biden was articulating a stated policy of, at least, the USA, the IMF and the EU. That is a helluva reach the VP has. I know you think he set Ukraine policy...but I'd like to hear how he set Ukraine policy for the EU, too.
Third, "We now know the WB is a registered Democrat." We do?
Fourth, CIA reports use footnotes. It is just stupid to assert that only law firms do.
Fifth, read the texts that were released last night, Baron. There was a clear quid pro quo. You can say that is OK with you, I guess, but you are just dead wrong about the facts. Remember: Trump lies. All the time. Constantly. Dumbfucks believe him...don't be a dumbfuck.
Sixth, yes, I know, I am wasting my time.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/10/03/interview-files-with-fired-ukraine-prosecutor-show-he-was-axed-because-of-joe-biden-833941
(no message)
(no message)
of expert opinion in not going to over rule what we can all understand.
Per IG estimony today. He also explained that the WB voluntarily offered the information....turns out that I’m a bit more of an expert on this right now.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukraine-whistleblower-did-not-disclose-contact-with-schiffs-committee-to-intel-inspector-general-sources-say
Schiff’s lawyers to draw this up (that timeline is also something that comes with being able to keep up with recent revelations).
I’ll choose Occam’s Razor here that the most likely reason for all of the footnotes and references written like a law firm brief designed to withstand questioning and to guide the argument for impeachment is because it was written by lawyers who were hired to do just that.
Who was lying about the subsequent “obstruction” claims? The then subsequent “corruption” claims. Or now?
You always presume Trump always lies, yet I think for all of his bluster, he is far more honest than the Democrats, and history proves me right.
Btw, when US Policy Is being used to enrich princelings, that is wrong. If laws were broken doing it, then it’s also illegal.......which is why it is perfectly reasonable to ask for an investigation. Zelensky and the transcripts settled the question of intimidation or quid pro quo with a “no”.
I’m trying to envision your response to this as being the same if it was Don Jr, and I’m not seeing it. You’re blinded by your disdain of Trump.
"WB rules changed intradepartmentally weeks before a new “complaint” is made so that directly witnessing an event is no longer necessary to make a charge." Can you support that now well debunked claim with any evidence?
I think Soros is the WB - don't you?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2019/09/video-biden-brags-that-he-got-ukraine-prosecutor-fired-in-exchange-for-1b-in-aid-3139022.html
bullshit without care as some sort of badge of stupidity everyday
Next you'll be showing me Giuliani's phone messages and downloads to prove Biden and HRC are actually Russian spies.
Unfuckingbelievable!
When you finally get something real information - please post it
(no message)