(no message)
It certainly helps Gabbard. Not sure why Hillary would do this.
If you have any doubt about Tulsi, you should just google how forcefully she is promoted on RT, and how many of her supporters have names like JoeAmerican87757895.
(no message)
The suspicious handles are the final nail in the coffin. Who else but Russian infiltrator-agitators would pick such patently obvious fake names? Dumskis.
I especially like the Orwellian, "She's a Russian asset bit. Not "agent," mind you, but "asset." I suppose Joe is a Manchurian Candidate asset for the memory care industry? He just doesn't know it, that's all.
I never thought I'd live to see the day of some righties waxing poetic about an ex-KGB autocrat and I never thought I'd live to see the day of lefties telling us to trust the CIA and ginning up hostilities with the Russkies.
(no message)
She's for reducing tensions with Russia rather than ramping them up, as you geniuses apparently wish to do. Of course Russian TV likes to put her on. If you have some evidence that she doesn't mean it or that the Russkies have control of her, then please post that evidence. You act as if there is something nefarious about her amplifying her views if she does it on RT versus the same exact theings she says on MSNBC or FoxNews. Moronic.
You think she's being used as an "asset" by the Russkies. How? What are some particulars on this, given your high level of confidence? You have something more than the fact that she appears on RT quite a bit, right? Let's hear it.
They do, however, promote and fund her.
That’s not necessarily her fault. But the notion that they are doing this in order to improve relations with the US is silly.
They want to foment chaos in the western democracies. And Putin blames Hillary for a variety of things, and sought revenge in 2016.
See the article below. Believe what you want. But realize this is not a particularly controversial view in the foreign policy community (experts, amirite?!).
Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/08/world/europe/unit-29155-russia-gru.amp.html
This "attack from the establishment" helps Tulsi, especially coming from Hills. The best thing for your party would be for Hillary to forever STFU.
Edit to add: it also makes your party seem "Russia obsessed" and unable to move past 2016. The average voter is sick of this shit, promote constructive ideas.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Any candidate who supports a higher standard for committing US troops to combat is Vlad's choice. Anyone shy of Hillary or Bolton is a Russian asset by your side's view. Very weird.
If I were "Vlad" (although I'm not on a first name basis with him like you are), I would donate and support every candidate in the US from now on. Every...last...one of them. Then, when one of them wins, the opposition can do Vlad's work, and undermine the strength of the POTUS by alleging that the POTUS is a "Russian asset."
The devolution of our language by pinheads like these continues.
(no message)
She's surging all of a sudden, this is the best thing to happen to her campaign.
Through what seemed like her incompetence as a candidate, she managed to get a failed real-estate developer elected president of the world’s last superpower. Maybe all of her moves, like ignoring the upper Midwest, were actually clever ploys to ensure she’d lose. Throw in the email server, the uranium mines, Bill, Libya, comments like “deplorables”, etc. Nobody could actually make that many mistakes. This theory could have legs...great big fat, cankly, piano legs.
And she is still deployed to cleverly cause candidate #12 to surge up the leaderboard. Maybe Vlad would rather stare at Tulsi than Pocahontas at the G20 meetings?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
There is more going on in the world than watching monster truck pulls on TV.
(no message)
There will come a day when a future generation of scholars will look back at this as another, smaller round of mindless conspiracy theories. They sound like a bunch of neo-cons, actually.
See, the Russians are going to support this third party candidate just like they did with Stein against me. It’s the only reason I lost.
Aside from all her flyovers of her “firewall” Wisconsin, of course.
(no message)