(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Or should they consider not impeaching Trump because you believe the Senate won't be fair?
The analysis framework posited by your linked article is interesting, by the way.
Link: Democrat Witness Noah Feldman: Trump Isn’t Impeached Until the House Tells the Senate
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
at the shift show, he was a bonafide hero? Times change, right?
(no message)
(no message)
Just because the prosecutor has drawn up an indictment, and everyone in his office agrees to indict, that does not mean the person is indicted.
Now, here is an interesting question: If a prosecutor draws up an indictment but doesn't file it, and then the prosecutor uses the threat of filing it to get someone to do something, would that be abuse of power?
(no message)
I've never practiced criminal law, federal or state. I was thinking of state indictments, and I assumed that the end of the process was a formal court document...in other words, a document endorsed by the court system that will try the case, not merely a charging document prepared by the prosecutor. It seems to me that the House impeachment vote is merely a "charging document" unless and until it is filed with the Senate, at which time it becomes an impeachment, and therefore more analogous to an indictment or filed charges. But, we may be taking this analogy too far afield. You still haven't answered Baron's question.