I know, I know, we need to have Hunter and the Whistleblower testify.
Why don’t we just stipulate that Orange committed impeachable offenses, but that because of judges, abortion, and 401K’s, the right won’t let him be removed? And then move on to November.
Link: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/16/white-house-violated-the-law-by-freezing-ukraine-aid-gao-says-099682
That this doesn't rise to the impeachable level.
No honest person can look at this mountain of evidence - the mountain that is always rising - and truly believe that Trump did not do EXACTLY what the House Dems have accused him of doing. He is guilty.
You can defend those actions, I guess, but it is simply intellectually dishonest to deny them. And it is no exaggeration to say that denying them further erodes our democracy.
(no message)
(no message)
I was happy to see that he threw cold water on the notion that these goons were seriously thinking of doing harm to our ambassador. That makes much more sense.
And either he - and all the other witnesses - are lying, or Pence is up to his eyeballs in this too. And Pompeo and Barr.
What a total clusterfuck.
(no message)
(no message)
In all likelihood, your party will have to defeat him at the polls, this 2nd round of kubuki theater probably isn't helping, imo.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
replying "probably not"
Can anyone explain to me why the bigger story here, and really the face of corruption, is why the son of a sitting VP, would be appointed to a Board of a corrupt firm in a corrupt country at 50, 000 per month, last nite Ted CRuz said it was 80,000 and apparently it was soon after his father was appointed point man to the Ukraine by Obama..
I mean Americans every day are appointed to such posts paying inordinate amounts of money..(The average American doesn't make that in a yr)
Doesn't this smack of impropriety? On its face, isn't this a sitting VP obtaining financial gain for his family using his office..Isnt this at a minimum , a conflict of interest, and an abuse of power, that Trump is charged with..
Has anyone read Biden's troubled past, and what makes anyone think he was qualified for that position?
Wasn't Trump just doing his job attempting to root out such apparent corruption?
(no message)
The BBC failed to mention that they are only allowed when democrats make them, though.
(no message)
(no message)
That may get you a slap on the wrist, AT WORSE Ive dealt with some of those Old political hacks, I haven't heard of GAO in yrs, one suspects its a pretty obsolete group
IMPEACHABLE OFENSE LAUGHABLE!
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
You are way out of your league on this one.
(no message)
(no message)
Go back to personnally insulting everyone.
Your league?Lol... you are a dupe,no critical thinking skills,no credibility..
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
It's not objectivity... it's situational advocacy.