What a petty POS this Scumbag is.
This fucking POS should just OFF himself.
Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/white-house-portrait-unveiling-may-093000201.html
Replies to: What a petty POS this Scumbag is.
Repackaging Donald's advice, for your kids and grandkids.
(no message)
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPDPzbLFeP4
Norms of civility are important. This presidency is shattering them all.
We need the next person, whoever and whenever it may be, to reconstruct the presidency from this wreckage.
Otherwise our future is Russia and Turkey. We will have proven that this country is too stupid to have a democracy.
You are correct as far as you go, but you don't go far enough.
No president has been more opposed than Trump, other than perhaps Lincoln. "The coup starts now." "Resist" "Tyrant" "He colluded with Russia to affect the election." Sports figures announcing ahead of time they won't go to the white House if they win. Celebrities calling for military coup. His campaign being "investigated." We are already Russia and Turkey. You just haven't noticed yet.
I agree/disagree, i think it was the president before him that had an openly condescending
attitude toward the working class. I agree we do need a civil President that is for all Americans, not just ones he deems worthy.
That's my favorite criticism.
Obama got re-elected by the working class, after apparently four years of alleged "down-talking". In 2012 (his closest victory) he handily won the <50k income demographic. He handily won union households (58% to 40%). He lost college graduates, but won high school grads, and HS and college dropouts.
It seems to me that a lot of the "working class" weren't seeing what you think you were seeing.
You’d think with this white supremacist hanging a black man and his wife
in the halls of Whitehouse would be appealing. A great show, a great message.
You recognize a kindred spirit?
(no message)
Not at all. Tell us again
how the Fat Fuck "crushed the curve". What an ignorant POS, as 90,000 died.
You apparently don't know what crushing the curve means, so I would be glad to
The infection curve never rose above the medical capacity of the country. Crushed.
It has nothing to do with absolute numbers, so when you mention them, you just display your ignorance of the matter.
Crushing the curve never had anything to do with reducing the dead, only spacing them out to allow the medical system to treat everyone. (Did you know there is no cure for this disease?...they can only treat symptoms?)
There. I explained it to you.
I know what your stupid tag line means. Obviously it is a dodge
so people forget what a poor job the fat slob has done addressing Covid 19. How many more people are going to die do to Fatty's incompetence? Your tag line is worth shit.
It is not a dodge to speak accurately & factually, and directly on point.
If you wanted to argue that the death toll is too high, start a thread. But, don't pretend that the "curve crush" strategy that everyone agreed was important then, now means something it never meant.
You don't help your cause with muddled arguments which, intentionally or not, rely on redefining "blue" to mean "red."
When you come up with facts, give us a heads up, we’ll read them.
(no message)
Heh.
(no message)
Crushing it? That would suggest that it will never come back. Defeating it perhaps?
(no message)
No hypocrisy here. All I did was explain the curve to him.
You moved your hypocrisy post.
I wasn't predicting the future. I was just stating a fact up until today. We'll have to wait and see what the future holds.
The hypocrisy post was meant to be posted below which you obviously knew. Sigh.
And whether the curve was ultimately crushed can’t be determined yet, your hyperbole notwithstanding. A more accurate statement is that it has been suppressed for now.
I didn't know it at the time. Sigh.
You moved it while I was responding. Sigh.
'64 probably still doesn't comprehend your point about the curve for now...a point about which we agree.
For now, yes. You think we will be when we open up everything to achieve herd immunity like you have
agreed with?
Yeah, there's still hope.
(no message)
For what?
(no message)
"Crushing" is in the present, why do you twist it into "crushed"?
As if someone doesn't know that the war isn't over?
I didn’t twist anything. In fact, in initial response I specifically used his word.
I also pointed out that crushing was hyperbole and that whether it is ultimately crushed is not yet known.
Now you want to answer my question?
Yeah, you don't understand "crushing" in the present tense.
It doesn't at all imply that it won't come back.
For example, if Tiger Woods starts the front nine of a tournament at -5, someone might say he is "crushing it". They aren't saying he is going to win the tourney, just that he is exceeding expectations.
In the case of CoVID, the concern was that the number of hospitalizations would exceed available capacity. By any objective measure, we're crushing it. It doesn't mean this mutating bitch of a virus is done, it means our response has exceeded it's objective... in the present tense.
Now, I don't care for the term crushing in this case, flatten was perfectly fine. But at least I understand what it means.
It suggests a much greater impact than what is happening and yes crushing something implies less
likelihood of return.
Now you want to answer my question above? For what is there greater hope for?
The term doesn't imply what you're inferring.
At least not to reasonable people.
A bald assertion of that means nothing. Look up the synonyms of the word. You are wrong.
(no message)
Read the beginning of this article.
You're twisting words into a straw man with your thesaurus out even after 2 different people explained to you what it meant in this context.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/as-social-distancing-shows-signs-of-working-whats-next-crush-the-curve-experts-say/2020/04/08/3c720e06-7923-11ea-b6ff-597f170df8f8_story.html
And......? Crushing denotes something other than flattening. Just a fact.
Do better.
Right, it means whatever you want it to I guess.
(no message)
No, again check it’s synonyms. You are just trying to be difficult. The attached may help you.
I can’t help it if you and others wrongly use the terms interchangeably.
Link: https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/04/15/we-need-to-crush-the-curve-now-or-covid-19-will-come-back-to-haunt-us/#66bc0f011006
How did you get from objecting to the implications of the word (in your mind) to objecting..
to the word itself?
And, more importantly, why did I not answer your question?
There's "greater hope" for your epic meltdown when Trump wins again.
(no message)
While we "Crush the Curve", That was Donald's goal right, how many more Americans will die?
(no message)
I wouldn't worry about it.
Since you're incapable of comprehending, why fret?
China bot alert
(no message)
Scumbag Alert
(no message)
64 refuses to hang your picture too?
(no message)
Yep!
(no message)
Obama did try to take down his successor, so I guess you could call him a scumbag.
The acts of the Left (insurance policy of the Russia hoax) are pretty unprecedented.
He did? You’ll need to post how he tried?
By the by - what does that have to do with hanging portraits in the Whitehouse?
It would be hilarious if the next president after Trump invites Trump and Obama for a joint ceremony
(no message)
hilarious! Maybe Obama can bring his birth certificate with him.
(no message)
Well...short form, anyway...
(no message)
Trump wouldn’t be able to read the long form
(no message)
"Russian Hoax"
Pure TrumpShit.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-Xw0_2eMJg
What is your point here?
Are you mixing up Facebook ads with collusion again? Seems like you guys all try to confuse the issues when you are faced with people speaking truth to you.
Oh please. Perhaps that they were dealing with a real problem as opposed to trying to take someone
down for no reason? You deny that the Russians illegally helped Orange in the election? You deny there were multiple contacts between the Orange campaign and the Russians while they were doing this?
Maybe. But then their own notes and internal communications make that an unreasonable belief.
(no message)
Such as? Like Obama’s comments in Rice’s notes. Again stop with the BS.
(no message)
Pretty bold statement Cotton.......without evidentiary support.
(no message)
Heh. Funny. Share the video with us. Hypocrite much?
I only added the hypocrite comment because you did above. It applies in this instance (you calling for evidence of public things, while mentioning unproven non-public things regularly), but I wasn't going to go there until you did.
For a hypocrisy hater you sure engage in plenty of it. Hold the other side to the highest standard
of proof, yet flood the zone with shit in attacking your opponent. All while claiming to be a staunch opponent of hypocrisy.
Hypocrite.
The post above was because you posted this above. I consider it responded to.
(no message)
Sure sunshine. Shuffle, shuffle.
(no message)
Well, it was an ad hominem. Unecessary to begin with.
You brought up hypocrisy, not me. I responded above, and then added the hypocrite comment down here, then you moved your post. So, I responded, then you shuffled elsewhere.
I did? What was the video comment then? Stop dissembling.
(no message)