(no message)
Mara Lago was ground zero for finding targets.
Weirdo.
(no message)
Or only credible when defending Trump from impeachment?
protecting him.
I don't see why lifelong Republicans Mueller and Comey would actively protect Clinton.
It's also very likely Trump knew what was going on and looked the other way (at best) or was somehow bribed/influenced to look the other way..
From the unsealed records: "Giuffre has said she fell under Maxwell and Epstein's influence when she was a teenager working at Mar-a-Lago, the Palm Beach, Fla., resort owned by Trump."
We know for a fact Maxwell recruited victims from Mar-a-lago, and instead of being outraged by that, Trump wishes her well? How can you defend that?
My point is you are looking at this with very one-sided blinders. This has just as much potential to take down Trump and several key associates such as Barr, Acosta, and Dershowitz.
Link: https://www.npr.org/2020/07/31/896627505/judge-releases-trove-of-sealed-records-related-to-case-against-ghislaine-maxwell?fbclid=IwAR39rWDjpO-8Vf9H8k-0OyhhHRq3jwexW0OcX61jDe2twTX6M_oTXc8hH3g
(no message)
(no message)
If Maxwell had recruited victims from any property that Clinton or other Dems owned, that would be all the evidence you would need to know they were in on it.
I admit Clinton was likely in on it.
You have 2 standards with the evidence at hand.
(no message)