(no message)
No Constitutional question even necessary....
Guess that was another slight miscalculation.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Then read the other 40 or 50 decisions. Maybe you'll find some peace.
(no message)
(no message)
Georgia, or the “Trail of Tears” Georgia, or the “Civil Rights Georgia”? Pick your sedition.
“On my mind” Georgia?
I’ll take the play at home sedition...
(no message)
As Senator Murphy articulated today on the Senate floor, one “cannot at the same time love America, and hate Democracy.”
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
with the ink still wet.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
"The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue."
Alito/Thomas dissent on procedural grounds, as they believe any state v state lawsuit must be heard regardless of the merits.
This is how the Court is supposed to operate. Of course, politically it shall only reinforce the paranoia of the right that the Swamp controls everything. It will be interesting to see how this impacts the runoffs in Georgia.
Link: https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-21/supreme-court-kills-anti-pot-legalization-lawsuit
Such a phrase suggests there was “a ruling.”
Rather, the Court swatted away this complaint in the same manner they would deny to hear a pro se motion from a Texas inmate bitching about his Rape conviction in state court.
This was a horseshit complaint from the jump. Any lawyer who signed off on the complaint (including members of Congress) should be referred to their respective state bar for disciplinary action.
(no message)
Link: https://www.denverpost.com/2016/03/21/supreme-court-denies-oklahoma-and-nebraska-challenge-to-colorado-pot/
(no message)
(no message)
using a slogan he has no intention of honoring.
$212 million in gullible money's to fight honoring - American's and democracy in our republic.
The notion that Trump's nominees are a claque is no longer sustainable.
(no message)
(no message)
May have been the Christmas decorations, however.
There is way too much Trump transference going around. He's just a man and a very flawed one. Our system is what counts and it allows for corrections.
(no message)
Many injuries occur at home.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The former is for Internet message boards.
The latter must survive the scrutiny of opposing counsel and the judge/panel. Trump was never able to muster any actual evidence of fraud or ballot manipulation. Too many checks ‘n balances in place.
Put your big boy pants on, and yield to democracy.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Coffee
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
They should use me in their marketing. Funny thing is... it still feels like yesterday.
figure out why they honored him. Such a bright mind wasted on such a narrow judicial view.
decent to the lawyers.
seem to guide his jurisprudence a bit too much.
bad because you disagree with the way he views the constitution?
(no message)
(no message)
example of a right of center jurist. Alito and Thomas, not so much.