Betting markets say the Dems sweep in Georgia. Guess it's back to a glorious FDR type society
Better practicing digging holes and filling them back in so you can qualify for a CCC or CWA job. Brother can you spare me a dime?
Replies to: Betting markets say the Dems sweep in Georgia. Guess it's back to a glorious FDR type society
Proud of W & Don, are ya now? If so which, the patriotic trainwreck or criminal scumbag trainwreck?
(no message)
ND521 still pining for his daddy Obama,has Obama’s caddy now Alzheimer Joe🤡🌎
(no message)
Dem president locked up Japanese,confiscated their property
(no message)
Warnock has a shot...Perdue will win. NT
(no message)
Agree. Both R’s should win, but the race factor helps the Rev.
(no message)
I will believe it when I see it.
I can't believe that Georgia's GOP is dumb enough to be convinced by Trump's complaining about the rigged system.
I bet they'll show up tomorrow, bigly.
The Dem votes are already in. Tomorrow is just ceremonial.
(no message)
The betting markets had Trump winning too until about midnight eastern on election day and the now
infamous "ballot drops"... how quickly will the dems request an audit on election integrity in GA if the massive dem lead heading into election day evaporates by the evening and 95%+ of ballot drops go in one direction?
Next time, subscribe to my newsletter. It predicted what would happen right on the nose.
(no message)
Mostly suitcases full of ballots stashed under tables
(no message)
Mostly honest election results
(no message)
Food for thought (see link)...what say you?
I believe these stats include the Great Depression... how about unemployment stats for FDR?
The highest rate of U.S. unemployment was 24.9% in 1933, during the Great Depression. 1 Unemployment remained above 14% from 1931 to 1940.
You might believe that, but the article's text and numbers show the data starts in 1950...so, if we
focus on what was presented, it is not a 'fait accompli" that a Democratic Party controlled government will result in non-productive ditch digging. If you have data to the contrary, please share it.
Beyond this aspect, there is genuine reason to be 'concerned' about what could happen under this scenario (e.g. extreme factions exerting pressure)...however, it's not a foregone conclusion...Biden won his party's nomination by running as a moderate, and he won the Presidency under the same banner (you can check out his policy positions on the web).
I shall be very very happy if the Biden presidency is moderate.
I just feel he's an old hack who shall have a ceremonial Presidency until he is replaced by Kamala. With both houses of Congress... the radical Dems will ram through a revolutionary agenda on every one of their pet issues, economic, social and above all electoral reform (to lock in their majority). I hope you are right and I am wrong.
Biden administration is a cross between BLM wannabes and a guest list to a bar-mitzvah,Zionist thug
(no message)
Where do you get this from? The Senate would be 50/50 with several moderate D’s You really think
Joe Manchin is gonna ram through a progressive agenda?
The Coastal Elites rejoice. Yah reckon that the Green New Deal will pass a 50-50 Senate?
Yah think you have a little bit of your own boogie man going here?
Many of the major elements of the Green New Deal would pass a 50-50 Senate
In addition, taxes would be raised even in a recession, there would be some sort of bailout for Dem state debt to pay off government union workers, critical race theory would become standard in our schools (where it is not already), use of gender distinction words in government documents would be banned, small business red tape would be increased (for the ones still in business), DC would become the 51st state, high tech companies would be encouraged to censor opposition expressions.... etc., etc. I mean, this is what the Dems want... isn't it?
Based on what evidence other than your say so?
My evidence is the make up of the 50 D’s. Nowhere near enough lefties for that to happen.
Oops...(rest of message to follow)...inflammatory than helpful to continually use the word "would'
instead of 'could'...and as I noted earlier, the odds of extreme legislation being proposed - much less passed, as Frank pointed out - are low. Nonetheless, it 'would' be wise to prepare for changes that are not to everyone's liking...but hopefully to everyone's benefit.
You...and every conservative in the country is 'concerned' and that's fair...but it's more
(no message)