It is no longer arguable that they are not doing this on purpose regardless of the harm it does to average Americans trying to make ends meet and helping Putin and other enemies in the process. This is how the NetZero fossil fuel policy is operating (with examples) of just the last three weeks.
Link: https://choiceclips.whatfinger.com/2022/05/22/biden-is-obliterated-for-trying-to-destroy-american-energy-production/
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
safe from the whatever you bring to the table
You have nothin'
(no message)
Or you could google up an article explaning how defending climate change does not impact gas prices. I’m sure there must be one out there in the dark web
Disruption -->Severe Impact on Humankind)...all of this is logical and backed up by physical science...now it's your turn to prove the Null Hypothesis...if you haven't started yet, get moving.
It also triggers severe OCD.
The CC left is psychologically terrified and desperately needs to feel in control of EVERYRTHING.
(no message)
is Baron saying that Biden is ACTIVELY trying to raise gas prices?...if so, he's somewhere off in "MTG Land"...if not, perhaps you have an idea what that declarative statement is meant to say.
prices. If u can't see that, yr not nearly as smart as u pretend to be. You are always out of yr depth against Baron anyway.
so that he can 'promote' a non-existent Climate Change crisis?...which virtually every other nation on earth believes is real?...
and therefore intentionally causing the rise in fossil fuel to placate them. Pretty simple strategy by pretty dumb man
(no message)
reminded me of this
(no message)
(no message)
Shit all the time. The powers that be booted eftg, you are worse than he ever was. Go away
Drama class was your best subject?
It's the essence of your and Baron's argument...and you can't defend it...pretty sad.
(no message)
burning of fossil fuels...btw, some factual, data based reasoning would certainly help.
We’ll be waiting…as we always do…
Since 1972 environ"mental" groups of one sort or another have predicted the end by, before, during 1982, 1999, 2000, 2004, 2007, 2020, 2030. Every 12 years seems to be the consensus by the noted climate expert AOC. . Weather people can't even predict showers for the next day's picnic but in 12 years they can predict doom. Greta is the leading voice of "climate change". How dare I say that with a grin? I love it. Follow the money. It's a long road into many a select few pockets. Don't litter. Be a good caretaker of the Earth and live life to enjoy.
Problem is: we eliminate the internal combustion engine but you still have to generate electrify to power the cars (assuming the electrical grid is fixed) and many who hate fossil fuels also hate nuclear energy.
other uses, btw)...the issue is 'Should Nuclear Power' be included in our future energy strategy, and if so, how much?...Yes, there are rabid anti-nukes...I"ve been dealing with them since 1974. Fortunately...and a big reason I voted for Obama and Biden...is that both of them have supported nuclear development (see link for Biden's position...check out Q412's Obama video posted a couple of days ago, as well). I have a good friend who is doing some consulting on the new TerraPower/GE/Hitachi "Natrium" Fast Reactor project slated for construction in Wyoming, so the Biden admin and his DOE Secretary are plowing the ground for new "GEN-IV" reactors (Billions have already been allocated) that are much needed...wish it were faster, but it's still progress in the right direction.
In the short term, it's essential that the Biden admin does all it can to keep existing reactors in operation, and ensure that the NRC amends regulations, where appropriate, so that new installations are not needlessly delayed or rejected.
This is going to be a very complex transition...don't hesitate to voice your concerns...and support for nuclear...to your Representatives and Senators.
Link: https://youtu.be/ypOvqKhFsZM
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Feel free to re-join if you're willing to do some work to support your position...
(no message)
(no message)
chaotic 'cloud chamber' sort of deflection he takes.
(no message)
(no message)
It might feel great to shut off the pipeline, but the consequences were devastating.
Electric cars and electric batteries will keep getting cheaper and better, but we're not there yet. In the meantime, we're stuck with having to use gas.
(no message)
(no message)
order of 38.2 Billion barrels of oil in 'Proven Reserves' (see linked EIA Report)...and we consume approximately 7.2 Billion barrels per year (search the EIA)...so, some simple arithmetic says that we can stay "Independent" of any foreign sources of oil for another 5.3 years...at which time, pending no new dramatic increases in our reserves, we'll be 'tapped out' and begging for oil.
Now granted, this involves a lot of "estimation", but it by no means paints a picture of "Abundance" when it comes to such a critical resource...just imagine the political implications of having to beg for every drop of oil sometime in the next 10, 20 or 50 years if we don't change our energy mix...given this 'writing on the wall', why would a reasonable person not take action to get off oil and gas ASAP?
Note: the 'ANWR' project is estimated to have between 4 and 11 Billion barrels of oil...not a huge increase in our reserves.
Link: https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/crudeoilreserves/
(no message)
It cannot be achieved overnight. It has to be gradual, but the Dems are so doctrinaire that they are blind to reality.
Meanwhile, the nation is getting crushed by gas prices. We had energy independence and Biden and the Dems pissed it away by their idiocy.
(no message)