the homes of supreme court judges but if the same protesters went into their homes and shot them they wouldn’t have anything to say.
But hey - don’t let reality stop you from making the argument.
are all they got, they would never take away anyone's 2nd amendment protection. 1st Amendment protections are easier to trim. Or so it seems.
(no message)
it breaking in since you wouldn’t voluntarily let someone in your house to protest. Great comparison.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Uneducated.
Then you twist a response to fit your agenda to make yourself feel better about yourself which is narcissistic.
Will do us both a favor and never respond to you again because your original post is just flat out pathetic.
(no message)
They are already allowed to use Molotov cocktails at “peaceful protest”.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Just to make a "rough analogy."
(no message)
10s to 100s of AR-15 child victims per year, not a clear solution.
Now, I support both some additional regulation on abortions and AR-15s, and I don't think either should be prohibited completely. But both the scale and the practical solutions available indicate these issues aren't logically comparable.
(no message)