(no message)
"And we must genuinely embrace the notion that both sides have something vital to defend. Concretely, those who call themselves "pro-life" must understand that those who describe themselves as "pro-choice" are desperate to defend women's bodily autonomy and secure their equal position in the economic and social life of our nation. And conversely, the latter advocates must acknowledge that the former are committed to the intrinsic equal dignity of every human being, born and unborn.
Once that's out of the way, we can begin the hard work of trying to FIND COMMON GROUND so that we can, together, care rightly for women, children (born and unborn) and families, both before and after they are born." (my emphasis)...
---------------------
Someone ask him to log onto the UHND Open Forum and identify himself...
(no message)
This idiot states we should have the right to govern ourselves but not our own bodies.
Let’s take a look at where he’s a Law Professor. Note Dame.
This line of baloney - “been a conclusion in search of a justification --tortured narrative of constantly shifting arguments, standards and rules.”
Gave me a chuckle.
The 73’ ruling didn’t corrupt the law and it took decades of conniving by special interest church groups and local politics to create this movement against a policy and amendment that nearly 80% of Americans agree with.
In truth on this issue this guy likely has done and will do more damage to law and politics in regional America than Pence did in Indiana and Flynn has done over all.
He’s an education wasted and now he’s wasting the educations of students today.
just a wannabe. I would imagine a real ND prof. would know more than you regarding law than
someone who just hung out his GED law shingle