1) while we are to be a colorblind and gender blind society, tomorrow's coverage won't support that narrative
2) for all of those who want separation of church and state, the SCOTUS oath won't allow it
The fact most of your buddies on here talk specifically about the color of her skin already tells me, you and your brethren
are not happy about her being black. You will support Thomas because he's an obvious R activist but when it comes to color
we know Obama was not accepted by your group because he is a black man.
So tomorrow, yeah, the media will talk about her color, gender and use it as if this changes America's bigotry but as annoying as it is
(and it will drive you mad, of course) MSM will shove it down our throats as if it really matters when the only thing that matters
are her tremendous qualifications. Something Barrett doesn't have.
of Joe's senility with indisputable racial overtones.
Clerked for three judges including Breyer but for one year stints with each.
I don't know, but possibly something wrong there, maybe rode the affirmative action train until Obama put her in civil service.
She certainly does not have a deep resume when looking at her time in private practice and clerking when comparing with Leondra Reid Kruger who clerked for Justice Stevens straight out of law school and has been on the bench of the California Supreme Court since 2015.
But to folks not in the field, she walks on water.
doesn't overindulge in beer drinking...good to have some 'balance' in the Supreme Court ;-).
Oh, and she clerked for Justice Breyer...could have had something to do with her nomination...but that's just my opinion.
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketanji_Brown_Jackson
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
research on your own...try to figure out why this issue exists. You at least need to have some appreciation of what drives those who don't share your view...then we can talk.
(no message)
(no message)
You know, where you totally know you are talking to a non-sentient computer program which, when it program doesn't anticipate a trap, it just twists questions back to you, and absolutely refuses to answer anything...but you are still impressed by the job the programmers did by sticking in some tidbits of pop culture.
judicial record and interpretation of the constitution. Unfortunately, you and the MSM won't allow me to debate those. If I don't agree, I'll be labeled a racist (as you've already done) or a misogynist.
(no message)
West Coast's point was that tomorrows liberal media and Dems will be strutting like peacocks about race rather than being above that and not letting it play a factor. This went over your head.
something you hate.
(no message)
Biden clearly said, he would like to put a black woman on the bench - of which there are/were a great many available.
No litmus test, just a promise kept that this is what he'd do.
Try another tack.
(no message)
I hope you're all happy. His descendant into madness is complete.
On more boards than this.
The supreme court's decisions. The January 6 hearings. The upcoming red wave at midterms. It's getting to him.
(no message)
Ever since your dust up with curly you've been super pissed. More so than usual. It can be hard sometimes.
He took a beating on that idiotic analysis of one of our hopeful recruits.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)