(no message)
Link: https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-runs-with-josh-hawley-solidarity-fist-and-flee-moment-2022-7
(no message)
mocked for it?
If you were at a BLM rally with your fist raised, and then it started to get crazy so you headed out quickly (assuming that is what he is doing in the picture), would you then be open to the same criticism that you heap on others?
Of course not. Liberalism Rule #2. The rules apply to thee, but not me”.
Are only certain protests ok with you? Like violence in front of a SCOTUS home toward their children and neighbors? Obviously, it’s not ok if the reason is that your party manipulates an election taking advantage of COVID no ID rules and unethical vote counters practices where they shut down the count and reopen later after sending one side home for the night.
He is morally bankrupt, has zero integrity, and is a coward.
Exactly your kind of candidate.
Senators and even lawyers have the right to protest…yet you use it to qualify why he was wrong to protest.
YOU consider the narrative fraudulent. YOU consider him morally bankrupt. YOU consider him to have no integrity (while supporting a guy who falsely claims he has cancer to other cancer victims to deceive them for their votes).
YOU consider him a coward.
These are all your own value judgments that you use to claim that a person doesn’t have the constitutional right to protest in a lawful manner.
At the same time, you allow protestors who blatantly ignore the law about protesting at the homes of judges considering active case with the intent of intimidation.
Your double standard is astounding, yet unsurprising (Liberalism Rule #2).
You are condemning protestors who don’t agree with you, and you seek to limit their rights and bully them. This is the very definition of a fascist.
You still believe that the "stolen election" remains a legitimate narrative.
You still believe that trafficking falsehoods is acceptable.
You still believe that the events of January 6th were a nothinburger and inconsequential.
You have yet to renounce Trump and/or deem him accountable for orchestrating one of the most disgraceful days in our nation's history.
Americans like you remain a big part of the problem. Deplorable.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Got it.
Your entire rant involves your opinions differing from the protestor. They have arguments to counter yours, but you don’t agree. Thus, they should not be allowed to protest in your mind.
Your twisted reasoning has led to a lot of suffering throughout history.
Your poor judgment prohibits you from distinguishing lawful protests and free speech vs coup/insurrection/criminality.
think that you get to be the arbiter who sits in judgment of what is a protest and also what is allowed to be protested.
Your Code Pink Vag hat wearers stormed closed session in congress the year before, but you said that was merely protest. Your abortion advocates have harrassed sitting SCOTUS members at their homes including their families and neighbors.....while the case was still under deliberation....and you call that a protest. You think that you get to decide. Whose judgment is really clouded? Yours.
The truth here is that the ANTIFA people were prepared with fomenters who succeeded in getting people to wave flags in the capital. They were let off. Pelosi had advanced warning of a protest but specifically countermanded an order from the house official to deploy them ahead of time. i am fairly sure this was planned, and the media was ready to go with the story. Regardless, it was less of a protest than the Left did at the church next to the White House and the one i mentioned during an active session of congress where they disrupted the meeting by pushing their way in. It was also far, far less violent that ANTIFA and BLM riots. But you see a distinction based only on what cause is being protested.
No different than some asshole cheering on his fraternity brother to rape a girl passed out on the couch.
Hawley is complicit.
Hawley even did what you say would be the proper thing to do...he left....and you don't give him credit, you mock him and assign him motives cooked up in your own mind. You project onto him your own motives because it is all that you know (Liberlaism Rule #1). You're textbook.
Your flawed thinking is the breeding pool for fascism. It is the reason that you supported forced vaccinations while claiming to be "prochoice". You then try to argue that others were at risk (falsely as we now see that COVID spread is not prevented by the vaccine), but then reject the very same argument from prolife advocates who say that the choice of abortion is harming another human being (correctly).
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)