(no message)
get to [August training] camp," Kelly said.
(no message)
I would anticipate the terms of his probation include regular and random drug testing.
We can surmise he had issues with the terms of his pre-trial diversion program, so let’s all hope he is successful this time.
Link: https://www.ndinsider.com/news/publicsafety/notre-dame-linebacker-te-von-coney-enters-plea-agreement-for/article_12059f30-e46c-57ff-88c4-eea928e901dd.html
(no message)
what issues are you alluding to?
That is why he was back in court. See link
Link: https://www.onefootdown.com/2018/5/17/17364800/notre-dame-football-tevon-coney-faces-trial-marijuana-fulton-county-indiana-linebacker-irish
The court records do not specify what those results were.
But it is OK to post dertogastory opinions because he is an ND football player?
not the other way around. That means he more than likely got a better deal with the current plea. It's over and he's expected to be full go against scUM.
Sounds like he failed a test before the December court date, but then passed subsequent one(s).
Link: http://www.news-sentinel.com/news/local-news/2018/05/16/notre-dame-footballs-tevon-coney-faces-aug-1-trial-in-2016-marijuana-case/?platform=hootsuite
(no message)
“Last October, Coney, a first-time offender, was ordered to probation for a drug screen but in December the court rejected a plea and a sentencing hearing was canceled.”
(no message)
It is more probable that he had another clean test and that suggested he could get a better deal. If Coney had a positive test after the arrest, he'd be dealing with a suspension at ND and there hasn't been talk of that yet.
"But, on April 30, Coney asked to withdraw from the agreement “based on the results of the testing in April of 2018,” according to a court filing." In other words, he had a clean test and didn't want to accept what the county was offering him. Getting a year of probation after getting arrested for possession and a subsequent failed drug test doesn't add up in Indiana. It more likely means the county finally made a more reasonable offer and Coney wanted it done.
The way I read this is that he is dealing with a very aggressive 'hanging" D.A. (or judge) who is being unreasonable versus what Coney's legal advice is telling him. The court in December may not have liked what Coney was offering to agree to. Indiana counties are doted with these types. A few years ago, my son had an issue (wasn't drug related) in Marion county and the prosecutor and judge wanted to throw the book at him even though it was his first offense of any kind. We hired a local attorney who did a lot of legal maneuvering over a year to get around the judge (specifically, he got a hearing scheduled when he knew the judge was not on the docket). Funny thing is my nephew only got what amounted to a verbal tongue lashing ( ala, " I don't want to see you in my court room again") from the judge in Lake county for the exact same offense.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)