The NC game is displaying a QB lightyears ahead of Book and Tua is looking Terrible with 2 INTs and a fumble (not lost) through roughly 2 quarters against this Clemson D. One of the INTs was a pick 6.
Clemson is proving their D is good enough to pressure any QB into making rookie mistakes.
promise land on a given day. Lawrence was just better and their receivers are light years better.
To have a chance in the playoffs, he'd have to have his best game ever throwing intermediate routes.
(no message)
(no message)
see. Everybody looks open for half a second.
an issue for Tua.
(no message)
re better than this. I know you are.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
hand as well. The reality is, you are likely one of the people I was referencing that were bashing and can't tell the difference between good D and bad QB play.
(no message)
don't have to announce it.
Rockne won, .
to Tua, are you? Tua , with his mistakes, still put three scores on the scoreboard..
Tonight, we see a QB that is 10x better than ours and he's making the same if not worse (pick 6) mistakes. So, it seems regardless of QB talent Clemson D makes almost any QB look bad.
The point was a QB under pressure has a hard time.
But, this silly board always points the finger at all the things that don't matter. They ignore the OL issues and jump to bad QB play, or slow receivers, etc. Or, they say things like Jurko should play. A guy that's barely played a down has a chance against a D like Clemson?!?! Umm, no. Or, Wimbush would have done better, and all sorts of retarded crap like that.
(no message)
(no message)
You didn't see how cute it was that oldi came to your defense below?
(no message)
No, you can't crash here.
(no message)
Stops they are the gay bath houses of today. But you know that.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
As the last few threads demonstrate, stupidity is contagious.
(no message)