Lock him up!
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Else to hang your hat on.
(no message)
there was nothing there?
That's odd seeing it was a big deal.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
He stole classified documents for his personal use (I say to monetize them). He gets to go to jail.
Read the statute Jim. There is SO much wiggle room. This is almost as ridiculous as the human trafficking nonsense.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Leads me to believe you're just arguing to argue.
I'm on vacation with family this weekend. We'll have to pick this up another time....
Link: PRA....
namely...
>Establishes public ownership of all Presidential records and defines the term Presidential records.
>Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.
There is no 'wiggle room'...there is no provision for "negotiation" of ownership...this isn't a case of "If" Trump will be found in violation...it's "When".
And yes. I have. Read it yourself.
not to mention highly classified docs 'Under Oath"...this proves "Knowledge" of wrongdoing...DJT just recently stated that he "Sent" those documents to Mar-a-Lago...this proves "Intent"...so, Mr. Student Lawyer, tell us if that is not enough to indict the man..and if so, be sure to provide documentation that backs up your claim. I'm not sure that "Motive" has anything to do with it, but I'll yield to your "Documented" evidence to the contrary.
It may be a game of wishful thinking for you...but not for Donald Trump...he's in the real world now.
Mr Student Lawyer? After 8 weeks? You're such a miserable douche. Read the PRA. I know Jim didn't. You're hung up on one element. And there is precious little case law on a president. Not anyone lifting docs. A president. This is already yesterday's news.
But like I said you have much bigger issues in front of you than trump. Until you find a good church you and your family are in rough shape. Time to get right. But a guy who advocates child rape it might be too late.
that it gives Trump ANY justification for taking those documents...otherwise, you're just a guy with an un-informed opinion.
btw, with that "...a guy who advocates child rape..." comment, it is not only out of line and despicable...but in legal terms it's a case of Libelous Defamation and something no aspiring attorney should ever engage in.
Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=94937
Think like a lawyer. Lesson 1.
You're on record rent boy. Mr Montclair state child groomer.
paragraph's wording...
-----------------------
"Rentboy.com may or may not have broken the law. I don’t know. But I do know, from the frantic emails filling my inbox, that the raid on its headquarters has thrown many gay, bisexual, and transgender YOUNG ADULTS into turmoil as their main source of income has been ripped away due to irresponsible and archaic views of sex work." (emphasis mine)
----------------------
Sam is talking about "ADULTS"...he uses that term "Young Adults", or "Young Men" repeatedly in the Op-Ed and that's the way I take it...young though they may be, they are men over 18 yrs of age...while you may very much WANT to find fault...there's none there...and you make the same mistake with the "Fetish Photo"...those 'puppies' are CLEARLY adults and I challenge you to post it and claim otherwise...deal with it...you and i may not want to join in, but it's not our business...so stop "Making Stuff Up"...and try being a decent human being by not using my grandkids as props for your attacks.
Link: https://archive.ph/dQ8sq
if you can't you're just blowing smoke...
And yes, I clearly said, I think to monetize the stolen classified documents.
PS: something tells me you haven't read the PRA.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)