All will soon be removed from House Intel committee (Swalwell and Schiff), and House Foreign Affairs Committee (Omar) from which they already should have been specifically disqualified from based on their behavior. McCarthy promised to remove them thankfully, and if someone else gets the Speaker job, they will do the same.
Hard to believe Democrats put these specific compromised people in their positions, although I suppose they could have put Swalwell on he ‘foreign affairs” committee for sleeping with the Chinese spy as an inside joke. Pelosi was a wretched Speaker.
and Kevin McCarthy's story straight on "Compromised Intelligence"...as well as other 'concerns'...
>Ms. Fang cozied up to several up and coming U.S. politicians (see link) and Rep. Swalwell was one of them...as soon as U.S. Intelligence officials alerted him to what Ms. Fang was up to, he severed all connections with her...per the Forbes/Axios report, there was no sexual relationship between the two.
>Adam Schiff and the Steele Dossier...as has been shown on this board multiple times, the Steele Dossier was merely a compilation of very brief 'hearsay' opinions which implied a strong connection between Russia and the Trump campaign...this intimation was later proven correct by a GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee Report that said without question that Russia meddled in the 2016 election and had strong ties to the Trump campaign.
>Rep. Omar...her comments on Israel were immediately and sharply challenged by Speaker Pelosi...and, Rep. Omar immediately clarified her statement with a rebuke of Anti-Semitism...however, being a U.S. citizen who immigrated from Somalia and is of the Muslim faith, she has a justifiable cause for concern as to how some Israelies (e.g. Netanyahu) treat Palestinians...and in point of fact, a "Two State Solution", which Netanyahu opposes, has been the consistent U.S. policy...therefore, it is understandable that she would be critical of the Israeli "Government"...but not of "Jews". That's a huge difference that Kevin McCarthy (much less BVZ) can't seem to grasp.
In short, the odds of the GOP-led House doing anything truly productive for the country are remote...instead, it's more likely that they'll spend all their time concocting baseless "Bengazi Games"
to the MAGA base for money and votes...fortunately, the entire nation will be watching and learning how useless they are when 2024 comes around.
Link: https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2020/12/19/heres-what-we-know-about-rep-swalwells-connection-to-a-suspected-chinese-spy/?sh=6c37d5012050
How to use Russia is Not for thee and only for me.
clearly link Russia and the Trump campaign.
Changing subject, deflection... are your specialty every time when you found your flaw was exposed.
excerpt from the Senate Intelligence Committee's Report...
--------------------
(U) TheCommittee found that Manafort's presence on the Campaign and proximity to Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign. Taken as a whole, Manafort's high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik and associates of Oleg Deripaska, represented a GRAVE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE THREAT. (emphasis mine)
--------------------
Color me suspicious, but I smell a rat when I think of Trump and the Russians.
I don't even like Trump, but you are worse.
The Steele Dossier was a folder of intelligence "hearsay"...the Senate Intel Committee report is the result of rigorous and deep analysis...yet you ignore it...how and why does this happen with you?...but that's just the counter to BVZ's erroneous suggestion that Adam Schiff was off base...he clearly wasn't...even GOP leadership agrees.
As to Rep. Swalwell, again BVZ "Makes Up" an outraged claim of a 'compromised' Democratic member of the House Intelligence Committee...which isn't true...yet he totally ignores the highly disturbing comments of Donald Trump in Helsinki that must have sent shock waves through our own Intelligence Committees...all 17 of them.
Finally, wrt Rep. Omar...while she may express her thoughts on Israeli government policies toward Palestinians 'impolitely', she is by no means "Anti-Semitic" and has clearly stated that position...which BVZ...and McCarthy chose to ignore.
Link: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf
I'll leave you to opine on whatever other BS you would like to sprinkle into this thread.
the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc...why is that reality not immediately grasped?
You guys want a banana republic nation-of-the-party, with a politicized/weaponized intelligence service, rather than a nation of laws, fairly administered.
IMO it has become 'systemic' not only with DJT, but with you and BVZ...e.g. his "Rules"...
All that being said...I've posted a piece of reality in this thread...i.e. the GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee Report (Vol. 5) that clearly connects the Trump campaign with the Russian effort to turn the 2016 election his way...so, we all know he and anyone supporting him is the real threat
It's not expected that you will accede to anything I've said...it's enough to show it to others since you have literally nothing to support your own contention.
Knowing that I hold all the...pardon the expression..."Trump Cards"...I welcome any other comments you might have.
Link: https://analytic-room.com/essays/projection-as-a-political-weapon-chris-bell-gary-senecal/
You post things that distract from my point, not contradict it. Indeed, your posts seem to contradict each other. It's kind of embarrassing for you. But then, you've shown you have no shame.
(no message)
(no message)
and that if they are truly concerned with U.S. security, they need to turn their eyes toward the BIGGEST RISK this country has ever seen...Donald Trump...that's not "Whataboutism"...it's 'Clarification'.
Why are you so keen to have him become the Misinfo Czar when he gets re-elected? Your logic is all over the place on this issue.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)