Slow Horses (Apple +) is absolutely terrific. Gary Oldham is sublime.
(no message)
Replies to: Slow Horses (Apple +) is absolutely terrific. Gary Oldham is sublime.
Real men don’t use the word “sublime” when they speak.
I believe you meant to say that he “kicks ass” or something else more manly.
Or wear vagina hats
(no message)
Glad you were able to find some reprieve
after all the wailing and sobbing you were doing this morning.
Link?
(no message)
Re: Link?
(no message)
Link: https://tinyurl.com/28amsc4d
Just to be clear, conor was never ashamed nor outraged by Jan. 6.
100% of the time when someone claims shame over something he didn't do, he is being disingenuous and, more precisely, being dishonest. Conor was also elated at the riot. Everyone can see the mileage that he and his ilk have gotten out of it. It's been incredibly valuable in building a framework by which to silence their political opponents and, specifically, speech.
That is why the ANTIFA thugs were brought in and Nancy stron armed the Sargent At Arms to not place
the National Guard when warnings came in. They planned the little kerfuffle, and then blew it out of all proportion with the complicity of their Main Stream media mouthpieces.
Pretty sure he was being genuine when he said he wanted to see 600 slain bodies dumped in the bay.
I've not done a ton of research on the topic, but it sounds like a fantastic way to restore the marine life population that has been lost due to overfishing. I don't agree with Conor on much, but he may be onto something here.
My post from the evening of January 6th:
My post from January 7th:
The righteous peaceful protests. Good one
Ooooh, the destruction caused by the BLM riots were righteous.
That's the difference that I hadn't considered. In the future, how can I distinguish between righteous mob violence and run-of-the-mill terrorism?
Do you really remember Conor or anyone here condoning the looting
by those who used the BLM protest as a cover?
I sure Don’t.
But I do remember many here seeing nothing wrong with the staged insurrection by the then POTUS and his cronies. I also remember that same POTUS side with Putin against the United States of America and many here having no issue with either of those happenings other than Conor, Basil, C94, Quest and a smattering of other posters.
I can see why you’re having difficulty when you always side with the terrorists.
He literally condoned it in the post he linked.
(no message)
Then you are having great difficulty in reading comprehension.
(no message)
Now I know why Conor refers to you as a useful idiot.
Ned compares Jan 6 to the BLM riots and Conor makes this distinction between BLM protests and criminal acts. But that's bullshit and you know it's bullshit. It's a diversion. You can't separate one from the other; especially in the context Ned provided. You wouldn't make that same distinction for those involved in Jan 6.
You wouldn't call out AOC for incendiary speech that could have led to more rioting in the same way you call out Trump for his incendiary speech that led to Jan 6.
The fact of the matter is, Conor did not feel shame or outrage when BLM protestors destroyed businesses or overtook govt buildings. He didn't call those protesters terrorist and he did not call for their slaughter. If effect, he absolutely condones violence and destruction in one instance and not another.
Yer soooo meeeean!
(no message)
You must struggle with selecting traffic light squares in “I am not a robot” testing.
The attached link is the DOJ website summarizing the federal prosecution of the scores of folks charged in the January 6th storming of the United States Capitol.
Let us know when you locate a similar website detailing the federal prosecutions of the “BLM protestors destroyed businesses or overtook govt buildings” during the summer of 2020. There is a reason you will not find it.
Go fish.
Link: https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases
Here ya go.
You're so full of shit.
I don't need to find any websites. You remember CHAZ/CHOP. You understand the equivalency even if you refuse to admit it.
You view Black Lives Matter protests as a criminal conspiracy. I do not.
For those Trump supporters who appeared in DC on January 6th to attend Trump's rally, I have no problem with those Americans. They are just gullible marks. Willfully blind or just plain stupid.
For those person who crossed the line, and knowingly breached the Capitol, their actions and decisions were criminal. For many of them, they were part of a insurgency, an attempted coup. There were different levels of culpability.
Nevertheless, like other disingenuous posters, you have never acknowledged the gravity of their actions (even the least culpable offenders) and the damage to America's global reputation as the beacon of democracy. Rather, you want to liken January 6th to whatever criminal conduct ensued during the summer of 2020 on Trump's watch.
Black Lives Matter is a criminal conspiracy.
They duped millions of dollars from people.
I don't believe that BLM rioters were criminal conspirators. As for those persons who crossed the line, and knowingly breached the Capitol, their actions and decisions were criminal. Agreed. Conspiracy though? Give me a break.
Note too that you are moving ever closer to agreeing with me that there the BLM and Jan 6 rioters are nearly identical in nature. I doubt you were as equally hysterical when commenting on both.
Black Lives Matter is a criminal conspiracy.
They duped millions of dollars from people.
I don't believe that BLM rioters were criminal conspirators. As for those persons who crossed the line, and knowingly breached the Capitol, their actions and decisions were criminal. Agreed. Conspiracy though? Give me a break.
Note too that you are moving ever closer to agreeing with me that there the BLM and Jan 6 rioters are nearly identical in nature. I doubt you were as equally hysterical when commenting on both.
He thinks Jan 6 was worse than 9/11 and Pearl Harbor
Probably not going to find common ground for a rational discussion.
Common ground exists. Conor is just dishonest about it.
(no message)
Another January 7th post saying McConnell needs to ask House for Impeachment.
Why are you providing all of this evidence that supports MAS's claim?
(no message)
You probably need 3 or 4 more edits.
(no message)
You could make 100 edits to most of your posts and you'd still never get it right.
(no message)
Emotional stuff. How did you ever survive it?
(no message)
Correct.
(no message)
Don't worry...I'm sending him tissues...
When my grandma was alive she served old ham on numerous occasions.
(no message)
Cannibalism.
(no message)
Um...it's Oldman NOT Oldham. SHEESH!...
Ya' know...this guy...
Darkest Hour (2017)
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (2011)
Romeo is Bleeding (1993) (my personal fav)
True Romance (1993)
Dracula (1992)
JFK (1991)
The Fifth Element (1997)
danke schön
(no message)
Bitte. I am Alsatian, after all.
(no message)