'insinuation'.
You probably smell like rotting greens.
Can you compare the numbers for us? Thanks.
Ed Dowd points out that in the 18-64 age group Excess deaths were up over 30% as of August 2022 which are the latest figures release by the Group Life Insurance Companies and that actuaries point out that just a 10% increase would be a one in 200 year event and that 30% is off the charts statistically. Corporate Group life policies contain healthy working people and annual deaths in this group are usually quite predictable. No one can explain this unprecedented increase deaths in healthy young working people.
And let's assume it is indeed related to the pandemic, which you can't from what you have provided. But let's do it.
How can you be sure it was the vaccine, rather than cardiovascular after-effects of the virus itself? The virus attacks in all sorts of ways....
We would need a lot more data, see?
(no message)
The vaccines received standard vetting. There was (and is) no reason to suspect that they would cause long-term harm.
(no message)
Because JHU says that it takes 5-10 years to assess whether a typical vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials.
Health Canada reports it can take 10 years for a vaccine to be developed, tested, and approved.
UChicago says getting approval to use a vaccine on the general public can take several years.
I could go on and on. You used the word "standard" but a simple Google search suggests that the vetting process was fast tracked.
Are you suggesting that you know anything about this, other than what you read on dumbfuckconspiracies.com?
(no message)
I'm curious about why you're giving me different information from the other sources I've listed.
And now I'm curious to know where it is that any of us are referring to this as a conspiracy. Why are you bringing that up? It seems completely irrelevant to the current discussion.
Maybe you think so too.
Would you argue that all government agencies are competent? Of course not. Especially not if Trump is in charge, am I right?
People in government can have conflicts of interest. Fatima Sandford claims that exercise and nutrition are just a small sliver of the problem when it comes to obesity and says that its primarily genetics that are causing the pandemic we are in. She was recently nominated to Biden's nutrition dietary guidelines advisory. She also happens to accepted thousands of dollars from pharmaceutical companies; primarily from the manufacturer of semiglutide.
Fauci lied about masks, then he told us he lied, and provided justification for his lie.
Given all of that, why wouldn't you expect people to be skeptical? There is incompetence. There are conflicts of interest. There is dishonesty. Is it really that terrible a thing that people ask questions?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
He gets a little ego boost by being here...as long as he doesn't have to actually respond to a second level question.
(no message)
(no message)
I don't know what is causing these deaths but the vaccines must be suspect because they came on the scene in 2021 when this problem started, some doctors say the spike protein negatively affects immune systems and this excess death phenomenon is world wide except for Africa. It should be thoroughly investigated.
Link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/australia-death-heart-attack-surges-17-2022-changed/
I have also heard about an increase death rate in that age group. I think a big issue right now is credibility, but I have already made my views on that known before.
And I bet there are many that are in progress.
Whether the right will find them "credible" depends, of course, on whether Tucker Carlson does.
I am not interested in rehashing those topics, just pointing out your new found intellectual curiosity and fairness.
You guys shut down all debate. Dems banned people from Twitter. You were the most closed minded and anti science people around. And you persisted on it long after the COVID threat had subsided to a low baseline.
Prescribed (guess what) HCQ. Now I'm doing fine.
And instead we have "it couldn't have been a lab leak, we have consensus on that and anyone who doesn't believe it is banned from socials." It's a major problem.
And, if we here at UHND are honest, we have no idea what happened. Lots of smart people think it was a lab leak; lots of smart people think it had its origins in animals.
All we know for sure is that the Chinese can't be trusted to look into it on their own.
Because it's clear we know so little that most possibilities are still on the table. So, like you say and I agree, it's imperative that we find out.
(no message)
Ill call it collective sanity. It's completely out of control (over and under shooting) and is in desperate need of calibration, but it's still there.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)