"radical traditionalist" (ie practicing) catholics are to be watched as "violent extemists" and "potential terrorists".
The FBI memorandum deploys alarmingly detailed theological distinctions to distinguish between the Catholics whom the FBI deems acceptable, and those it does not.
Per the FBI memorandum :"Among those beliefs which distinguish the bad Catholics from the good ones are a preference for ‘the Traditional Latin Mass and pre-Vatican II teachings,’ and adherence to traditional Catholic teachings on sex and marriage (which the memorandum glibly describes as ‘anti-LGBTQ.’" The memorandum proposes recruiting Catholics to enter a sacred house of worship, talk to their fellow Catholics, and report those conversations back to the FBI so that the federal government can keep tabs on the bad Catholics.
These Biden DOJ guys really do hate catholics. Their prejudice oozes throguh both their internal memos and their actions. The thing about Biden is that he isn't a practicing catholic who actually follows the teachings of the Church....he is willing to accept the liberal doxology of the Left. Those that take Catholic Church teachings seriously and practice the faith fully (now referred to by them as radical traditionalists) are loathed and discriminated against as "potential terrorists".
19 AG's have called for answers. The Garland DOJ is backpedaling. They stand revealed yet again for at least the third time. This is no fluke.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-fbi-targeting-catholics-violent-extremists-under-scrutiny-state-ags-bigotry-festering
They happened to pick the ones who love Latin Mass, that's all.
And the LBGTQ+++ adenda is also not favored among Latinos.
It never pays to sell out on issues opposed by your constituents
(no message)
Had their way, he'd be banned from the Catholic Church.
(no message)
They know this would be against God's teaching and that it would threaten the salvation of their immortal soul. Their beliefs actually decrease their risk profile. In fact, others not having those beliefs (those that the FBI is comfortable with) would be a higher violence risk.
This is about bullying those who do not follow the woke agenda of the Left, and they have gained control of the DOJ.
(no message)
Oh wait....
The Catholic Church, as an institution, has become the religious wing of the left. The woke seminarians coming out of school will take the Church to even a darker place.
…..even the pope.
Don’t confuse the radicals that are given a platform by the liberal media to be a majority. They are far, far from that.
any of them? Some things never change
discussion are required...not violence by one side against the other...agreed?
(no message)
to be said in local languages with priests facing the congregation and lay persons serving as Eucharistic Ministers, etc....IMO just as the Holy Spirit gave the Apostles the "Gift of Tongues"...among many other changes. In short, the Council encouraged the RCC to interact with the MODERN world. (emphasis mine)...
Now, just as then, not everyone agreed, but it spawned fantastic Lay involvement everywhere and certainly got me more involved. Of course there is always the chance of overdoing it, but that means debate...without going back to pre-Vatican II days.
Can we agree on that and then tackle the contentious issues civilly?
Link: https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2022-10/benedict-xvi-letter-steubenville-pope-emeritus.html
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
clearly there's a problem that needs to be addressed. The offenders are virtually always deeply motivated by religious motives. The DOJ/FBI is duty bound to stop such attacks...how should they carry out their duty?
btw, the same holds true for protecting 'Pro-Life' persons and facilities.
Link: https://www.justice.gov/crt/recent-cases-violence-against-reproductive-health-care-providers
(no message)
stop perpetrators against either side of the issue?
(no message)