Or are dead young black men not really all that important?
don't be disingenuous.
The question is whether the "Pleasure" of gun ownership should take precedence over public safety.
Link: https://www.americanprogress.org/article/gun-violence-in-rural-america/
Their death toll is much much much higher than in any rural area.
And soaring is a relative term in this case.
Link: https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/firearms-death-rate-by-raceethnicity/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D
Add in the serious drug problems thanks to the Ds open border policy and you have an uptick in crime in the rural areas.
devoted to "Hot Spots"...wherever they may be.
If it looks scary, it's classified as an assault weapon. There was a ban at one time under Clinton and it did nothing. The left had control of all three branches and they did nothing. Worry about your own self, your climate anxiety, your equity obsession, your pro-abortion death culture, your fun drag queen parades , your need to destroy sports, your need to mutilate children, and let the rest of us protect our families in the way we see fit. In other words, mind your own flipping business.
(no message)
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US,maconcountyalabama,lowndescountyalabama,phillipscountyarkansas/PST045222
https://www.police1.com/ambush/articles/10-us-counties-with-the-highest-murder-rate-kerWgaEUmxJkn74J/#:~:text=Phillips%20County%2C%20Arkansas%20Homicide%20rate%3A%2034%20homicides,per%20100%2C000%20people%20Median%20household%20income%3A%20%2426%2C844
I'll let you draw your own conclusions.
Why do criminals, mostly democrats using illegal weapons, commit murder?
It's much more likely that young people are going to commit their first gun crime than older people. It's much more likely that people with one gun crime will commit another, etc. Let's start using data and science to address this problem.
I know, I know, probably racist and doesn't account for lived experiences and stuff.
Link: https://icjia.illinois.gov/researchhub/articles/examining-the-recidivism-of-firearm-offenders-using-state-criminal-history-and-mortality-data
has clearly demonstrated its effectiveness in many, many countries…do you deny that?…if so, what proof do you have that such measures didn’t produce the results noted?
We’re dealing in FACTS here, not invectives.
btw, any comment on the soaring rate of homicides in rural America?
has about 500 in it. Not one shooting in the 9 years I’ve lived here. Weird.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://www.cbc.ca/news/national-gun-trafficking-straw-buying-smuggling-firearms-1.5126228
(no message)
expected number of gun homicides to reach zero before acting, you simply aren't rational.
Link: https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback
Do you read your own links?
(no message)
Fewer guns …fewer for criminals to use.
(no message)
(no message)
te I see.
young people are dying by "assault weapons" in the inner cities. Still no answer on what to do about illegal handguns.
Granted, they are mostly buying the AR pistols.
The ATF is only trying to ban "shoulderable" ARs, though, so urbanites will still be able to kill each other with AR pistols.
Meanwhile, the ATF wants to round up suburbanites who actually care about having an arrest on their record...thus the administrative shoulderable ban (with no new law being passed by Congress).
For the Left, some deaths are worth stopping, and others are not.
No thanks.
(no message)