Trump says he will be arrested Tuesday; calls for civil unrest
Other reports suggest he is planning a rally on Tuesday in Waco at Branch Dividian site.
Also thinks “stolen” has two Ls.
Might be an interesting week.
Link: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/18/trump-protest-arrest-tuesday-00087738
Replies to: Trump says he will be arrested Tuesday; calls for civil unrest
Too funny. Same D.A. who reduced half of his felonies to misdemeanors.
Now wants to elevate a misdemeanor charge that the feds didn't even want to go after.
It is the most trivial of the ongoing investigations
Maybe that’s why it is happening first - trivial and relatively simple.
It is 100% a distraction attempt from Biden’s disastrous banking mess Chinese payments for policy
(no message)
Totally. We need distractions from things no one is paying attention to.
(no message)
As always, you show all signs of being conditioned.
(no message)
Hopefully, cameras will record his fingerprinting and mug shot...wonder what kind of face he'll make
...looks like he's going to get lots of practice going through the process.
btw, guaranteed, there will be a lot of Republicans stifling a smile at all of this.
He just posted this (all caps in original, obviously): “PROTEST, PROTEST, PROTEST!!!”
(no message)
Yes, make him a martyr.
Do something that you'd never do to anyone else, and then allow him to play the victim card over it. Allow the conversation to be about political grandstanding rather than the crimes he committed. Good thinking.
Not sure what message you're trying to send, but mine is that DJT is about to face 'Reality' for the
first time in his life...he'll be reduced to a common man accused of a crime...thus far he's been able to live in his narcissistic fantasy land...no more. Trump is all about "Image", and having to go through this process is definitely not going to sit well with him.
btw, are you not pleased that he is going to be held accountable for being "Individual #1"...the person responsible for Michael Cohen ending up in prison?
Seeing the jailing of Cohen has set precedent, if DJT is convicted (he should) does he receive
the same sentence, or a more severe sentence seeing he ordered the transaction?
Hard to imagine a lesser sentence for the "Sine Qua Non" in all of this...
(no message)
Uncharted legal waters. ! They better get it right.
If they get it wrong it might be enough to re-elect him.
Only amongst the MAGA crowd...there are enough sane people who can connect the dots, besides...
there are three more trials lined up with tapes of DJT asking for "One more than we've got"...plus clear evidence of Obstruction in finding/returning Top Secret Documents...plus communicating with a "War Room" before and during the Jan. 6th attack...IMO, no way those stains get overlooked come Election Day, 2024.
I don't know - I have zero faith in my fellow man. Just look at this board - you can pick off
an easy couple of dozen here who have the information we have and will, as sure as I'm typing this, will vote for
DJT to be the R nominee and for POTUS. And that's the majority if not all those who side with R policies (if in fact
any policies exist in the R camp) will vote for DJT. And they'll do it without pause.
DJT will somehow escape the shrapnel of all these investigations and it will be because of the human factor.
Everyone knows he's scum, stupid, a thief, a liar, a bigot, unfit to be in society and on and on but will decline
to convict him because they're programed somehow not to do so.
I hear you...there is an appalling percentage of voters who have no idea what "Woke" means, but use
it as a rallying cry all day, every day...YET, surprisingly...and pleasantly...a recent poll found that 56% of Americans (~1,000 polled) had a FAVORABLE impression of "Woke"(see link)...doesn't bode well for ANY GOP CANDIDATE who envisions using that template for 2024. Dems need to pound on POLICY and how their's affects ALL Americans...the GOP has no plan or platform...nor are they likely to cobble one together any time soon.
btw, if DJT were to win in 2024, I'll be headed to the Irish consulate to get my dual citizenship ;-).
Link: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article272907550.html
Indeed. This would totally revitalize him. How can they not see that? Or, is that their goal?
(no message)
They can't see it because they are idiots.
(no message)
Correct. Dumb move. And Banana Republic.
(no message)
That would be fun.
(no message)
"civil unrest"
(no message)
An arrest would be good timing to distract from the fact that Biden family are all agents of China.
(no message)
How ironic, just at a time payments from Chinese firms
To Biden family right after Joe left office are under scrutiny.Color me surprised!..
JB has made over $15M from books and speaking engagements already...he doesn't need shady deals to
pay for golden toilets like the guy about to be indicted.
How embarrassing for you to have to defend on this basis.
(no message)
Yes you sniffed it out [yawn] and there is a conspiracy zzzzzzz
(no message)
Call it an observation, and it is correct. It is good timing.
(no message)
“We just don’t know”. Btw, haven’t we seen this before somewhere?
….and before you assume anything, remember that I want DeSantis. But I also know that this is the SDNY bringing this, and they have voided fairness with Trump long ago. I do not share your liberal values (Liberalism Rule #3 - The ends justify the means). I’d like Trump not to be the only (but still much better) alternative to the Biden Disaster, but I don’t want it done by lying and cheating.
You mean this?
(no message)
Which ones were more peaceful?
(no message)
How is it you see them as peaceful?
(no message)
I didn't say either one was. The Left is the side which has difficulty judging peacefulness.
...as demonstrated by your inability to answer my question.
No...NedoftheHill has a serious deficiency in judging the severity of threats to this nation...
violent outbursts over racial injustice, while harmful and destructive, are no threat whatsoever to the integrity of our Constitutional way of life...Jan. 6th, however, was a premeditated attack on it.
The fact that you can't see this distinction is, to choose a word from many...Pitiful.
I think that’s called, no judgment abilities.
POTUS calling for an insurrection of the US government by his voting base is the same as a street protest run amok.
Ned gets it, he's not at all stupid...but unlike even Mitch McConnell he won't accept reality...
I can understand GOP politicians pandering for every conservative vote they can find, but there's no price for him to pay by just agreeing Jan. 6th was an unprecedented attack on our Constitution which FAR EXCEEDS any damage that a few "Hooligans" might cause...I can only hope he's simply trolling and not incapable of reason.
Sadly, he is not trolling. He believes that crap he spews.
(no message)
And yet neither of you are able to answer the question.
(no message)
Only you dumb shits are calling them peaceful. Everyone else says violence
is the wrong way to go about a protest.
Also, you dumb shits can’t seem to separate what is an insurrection fomented by POTUS/DJT and what is a street protest, protesting police violence against our black and brown neighbors and friends.
The Left was doing it for a year or so. CNN made the meme, not me.
But, I'm glad that Trump didn't call for violence.
Everytime he asks for confrotation, it's about violence. As I noted above or below, his
rhetoric is about punching someone or hurting them or it's an insurrection or using the military to stop people
from voicing their opinions.
So, if Trump calls for a protest, he is calling for violence.
Trump is the only one saying this
(no message)
Granted, he didn't say that.
I'm assuming the article would have quoted him if he called for civil unrest, but they didn't quote him. They just speculated about "the type of civil unrest he could unleash if he faces charges"...that is a quote from Politico, not Trump. Maybe they said the same things about BLM and Antifa and all the Dems who called for those protests, I don't know.
More importantly, why are you guys suddenly trying to make Trump look sympathetic again? Seriously, let him politically die in obscurity. Don't help him out.
He called for protests. That, by definition, is civil unrest. So you’re wrong.
(no message)
A string of whatabouts by the usual dipshits. Shocker!
(no message)
"Totally Differentism" Liberalism Rule #8. When you do it, it's different.
(no message)
Whataboutism: a term to allow Dems to condemn GOP for acts done by Dems.
GOP is not allowed to call for protests. Only Dems can do that.
Hypocrasy much?
But of course, none of them are wrong. You can scream “Whatabout” all you but you
Continue to display what a hypocrite you truly are. But you know that already but can’t help yourself.
You're against protests?
How fascist.
I’m against leaders summoning the mob
Because you and I both know that’s what he’s doing.
Interesting perspective.
I think that protesting is kinda like a constitutional right, but what do I know.
Link: https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/3483790-biden-encourages-people-to-violate-the-law-by-protesting-at-justices-homes/
Interesting you completely ignore the history of DJT and what violence he foments.
From beating up “punch in the face the old fashion way” (referring to protesters. He use the military to remove protesters for a photo op in front of a church.
Called for an insurrection of the government.
I pretty sure by now, we all know what he is talking about.
Yeah, I know he's a dick Jim.
But calling for protests is neither unique nor wrong.
I support anyone's right to protest if they are peaceful and legal. Even your occupation of Wall Street back in the day.
Always like it when you purposely miss the point.
Yeah, only R’s would complain and howl at protesters they don’t agree with. We’ve seen it for years. But you totally sidestepping what we know as fact about DJT and his requests for confrontation. Without ever needing to exaggerate DJT’s intent we know his idea of protesting is backed by violence.
So yeah, not many Libs would object to someone calling for protests. If DJT didn’t have a history to back his rhetoric with violence, not many could object with reason.
Not to mention, Maxine Watters and Schumer both doing the same. But of course, Chris is the
Ultimate partisan hack who sees no wrong with his side doing this. Now, if he would have screamed down from his ivory tower when Waters and Schumer summoned their mobs, he would have a leg to stand on. But he didn’t because he agreed with both of them. He’s funny like that.
So you are saying that Chris is not always against leaders summoning mobs.
Maybe that's why he loves the what about deflection so much.
The next time he says anything negative about any person on his side of the fence
Will be the first. He has called many a GOPer slimy. I’ve asked (a few times) if there are any Dems that fall into that category. I know this will come as a shock to you but I have yet to get an answer. We all know Washington is full of lying scumbags but only on the GOP side, at least according to him.
Then very many Dems called for civil unrest over the past few years. Were you concerned about them?
Many more Dems have called for civil unrest than members of the GOP. The Dems are the party of civil unrest by your definition.
Are people not allowed to protest? I don’t want to see anything
Stupid happen but people are allowed to voice their displeasure. But you have proven to sit in silence when cities are destroyed but Biden voters.
I really think you just need to sit this one out because, as usual, you’re full of shit.
You yourself wanted protests in2016 after the election.Protests are legal for all did you know that?
(no message)
Link to that? - your guy tells those at his rallies to punch, beat up protesters,
had the military remove protesters using rubber bullets and tear-gas because he wanted a photo op. I think there is enough relevant information on DJT to know he’s calling for a violent protest because he’s going to be indicted for breaking US laws.
Meant for Chris.
(no message)
The left's protests are peaceful protesters, don't you know that?
(no message)
You mean he didn't post this on his community board?
Former President Donald Trump said he expects to be arrested Tuesday in connection with an investigation conducted by the Manhattan District Attorney's office and is calling for protests ahead of his possible indictment.
"The far & away leading Republican candidate & former president of the United States of America, will be arrested on Tuesday of next week. Protest, take our nation back!"
He has a community board? Interesting. But, thank you for noting he didn't call for civil unrest.
Chris said he said that. He didn't. We agree on that, at least.
Biden should send in the Marines to stop protesting, or I mean civil unrest.
This is worse than 9/11 and Pearl Harbor. If these protests are allowed to happen, it threatens democracy itself.