Soo, Demented Joe negotiates a bipartisan deal on infrastructure.
Was there any major bipartisan legislation passed under Orange, or even Barry for that matter?
Nice to have realistic professionals back in charge.
Replies to: Soo, Demented Joe negotiates a bipartisan deal on infrastructure.
THIS is what the country wants. Kudos all around.
(no message)
Link: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/24/biden-meeting-senate-bipartisan-infrastructure-talks-495941
How do you know? From your link: "details of which remain unreleased"
Why do I have this fear that at least half of that (I'm being nice) is a bullshit waste of money? Oh, yeah, its because wasting money is one of the few things the parties can agree on.
One can always hope, though. You never know.
More than half is a waste of money... but that is pretty decent from the government.
Sometimes the best you can achieve is so much better than the alternatives.
Damn your pragmatism!! It has to be all real infrastructure or nothing gets done.
Even with an equally divided Congress and all of the wing nuts with agendas on both sides.
Sssssssstrawwwwmannnnn!
(no message)
Nuttttttttttttttto!
(no message)
Except for the true wackos. See below.
(no message)
Trillions on unrelated projects and woo-woo? Do you have the polls on this?
Also, how did you mark our long overdue national Juneteenth hootenanny?
That would be hard to do if the reported amount of the deal, $950 billion is correct.
(no message)
Just goes to show that there's a silver lining in everything.
In fairness, though, they could probably have any dollar amount on the bill and Joe wouldn't be any wiser.
"I didn't get a "harumph!" outta that guy!"
Yup, calling out yer obsessed BS.
(no message)
Dementia Joe. Demented Frank.
(no message)
And the dive for the ankle. So predictable.
(no message)
A one time hit doesn't count. You have to go to Thread Level 10, then get the thread locked.
There is one common denominator in those threads: You, the Franklebiter.
Me and a true MAGA warrior, mostly MAS, and you, and Tampa bless his departed soul.
Of course you leave out that half of the equation. You need both half’s.
Always you. One common denominator.
(no message)
Nah bro...like the song it takes two here.
(no message)
.
(no message)
Funny you should ask, Franklin.
Eeeeeverybody loves somebody sometime...
Link: https://www.quorum.us/data-driven-insights/may-2018-congressional-activity-report/
Eeeeeeverybody loves someone, somehow
Whhhhhen the moon hits your eye like a big-a pizza pie, that's amore...
Contain your wood sporting. Depends on how you define
major. I’m sure the conservation bill was a nice uncontroversial piece of legislation.
Your slip is showing again as your anger and mental fixation continues.
Nope,you opened yr pie hole give slow Joe some props, and MAS handed you your hat again. Doesnt
it get old? Don't worry, yr minions will be here soon to flail away, and try and bail you out. Yr getting hard on their backs, I'm sure
A true objective voice of reason.
(no message)
How much sleep do you get per night, Frank?
(no message)
More evidence of your unstable and angry fixation.
(no message)
Less than six hours?
(no message)
Less than five hours?
(no message)
You are truly a pathetic creature to be pitied.
(no message)
Less than four?
Please tell me no.
So sad. Keep going so the full display is out there.
Seek help.
Here you go, Frank.
And don't hesitate to share with them all the things that prevent you from getting proper sleep. All the things on your mind that need to be changed.
Link: https://www.pennmedicine.org/for-patients-and-visitors/find-a-program-or-service/sleep-medicine
Bye, keep up your anger fueled nuttiness.
(no message)
.
(no message)
You sure are revved up any time anyone mocks Joe.
(no message)
Really? I’m not the one who posted to myself 9 times in this thread. THAT’S REVVED UP.
I will concede my mistakes posting on an iPhone outside of the office.
There you go. See, everything has its place.
(no message)
Quick, Frank, before Mark locks this!
(no message)
I believe Mark is on an undercover assignment related to the podcast.
(no message)
Sounds like a big deal. Let's enjoy this freedom while it lasts.
(no message)
Return to me-ee, all is forgiven...
Horrible law, but bipartisan, nonetheless.
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/14/trump-endorses-criminal-justice-reform-bill-first-step-act
Broadband
Opioids
You reckon Joe might benefit from some?
Link: https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/health/2018/10/24/trump-signs-opioid-crisis-bill-into-law-rare-bipartisan-victory-fentanyl-painkillers/1741031002/
Also what Joe tells Jill when he needs to use the bathroom.
Link: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-ppp-reform-bill-restrictions-small-business-loan-recipients
Stream protection
Now what we need is weak stream prevention for Joe.
Link: https://www.doi.gov/blog/president-trump-fulfills-promise-miners-signs-bipartisan-legislation-repeal-stream
VA Accountability and Whistleblowers
Did you know the Russkies infiltrated Walter Reed?
Link: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2017/h307
All uncontroversial measures.
(no message)
Careful moving those goalposts, Frank. You might pull something.
(no message)
Uhm nah. But just keep your twisted anger going. 11 so far in this thread.
(no message)
.
(no message)
See, you found it after all? Everything has its place.
(no message)
Indeed. you really do have issues.
Boy, you really got this one all wrong, didn't ya, Frank?
Have you ever written those words here, BTW?
I have gotten plenty wrong. Not this one though that you are trying to twist.
It’s pretty obvious you know what I meant and are comparing things where there was generally no division in the Congress. But knock yourself out.
.
(no message)
Wrong spot again.
(no message)
You should emulate your White House and edit your original post to say...
"bipartisan legislation that I deem difficult legislation."
You're a sly one!
Except I’m not the only one who deemed it difficult.
The prior occupant couldn’t do it in 4 years.
He couldn't get a deal done on an infrastructure bill that doesn't deal with actual infrastructure?
Yep, that's a fail!
Most of it does which is the best you get in a compromise.
Now you are a spending hawk all of a sudden? Please. It’s a necessary bill with some pork still in and a lot taken out.
I have always been for big spending on infrastructure.
Thus my opposition to this bill.
And, you are incorrect again, most of it does not go to actual infrastructure.
Are you saying there isn’t “big spending” on infrastructure in this bill?
Pork and unrelated stuff are the life blood of Congress. It’s the art of the possible in an equally divided Congress.
Shed your hatred and anger over being wrong about Biden being nominated and elected. Breathe a little. You have issues. Work on them.
He did nothing, public opinion was against the Dems, they caved.
(no message)
So you're admitting you don't understand negotiation involves compromise on both sides?
Typical Trumper.
Queue the outrage machine to say "it was his handers" in 3, 2, 1....
or a comment on Kamala at the border.
You mean “the giggling whore”? From the same fine folks who were so offended over the reference to
“Orange”.