How many know exactly what is in it?.......I think you'll probably be surprised
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ccMKZhB_QU
Re: immigration. He lied to us, did nothing for 3 yrs, blew up Trump's successful policies, now wants to save his ass for an election.
No thank you.
on his FIRST DAY in office...Jan. 20, 2021...which you were shown just 3 days ago...yet you continue to repeat your false claim of Biden "sitting on his hands" for 3 yrs...it's a challenge dealing with shameless posters, but given the ease of refuting them...doable.
As for Levin's comments, he completely ignores the months-long negotiations for the bipartisan Senate Immigration Bill...that even had CBP approval...unfortunately, that would have taken away Trump's #1 talking point ...so he killed it.
Link: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/01/20/fact-sheet-president-biden-sends-immigration-bill-to-congress-as-part-of-his-commitment-to-modernize-our-immigration-system/
(no message)
Already taking credit because he sorely needs it.
No thank you, DJT will fix it until we get a bill.
This guys solution was to send Kam-A-L -A after he blew up successful. Policies.
We have to deport first all we can find.
Except that it would have made a real difference at the border, which is bad for Trump.
Don't act like your party gives two shits about this. Because all it cares about is Trump.
(no message)
Are you actually disputing the idea that Trump killed this bill, even though it contained everything the GOP has been asking for, and nothing for the Dems?
Oh, wait. Forgot who I was responding to. Of course you are.
Link: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4448612-lankford-defends-border-bill/
He specifically states it is a something is better than nothing quote.
If you are going to lie, try someone else.
integrity. Unless they capture 60 senate votes this is the best they will ever get.
And everyone knows that Lankford is soft on the border.
(no message)
(no message)
But you know Orange Jesus blew that all up!
(no message)
Whatever "teeth" the left is trying to pretend this adds, it's meaningless, because it would lock in giving Biden's handlers the freedom to override any part of it. Basically, it adds a ton of spending while giving the left whatever freedom they want to suspend any part of it as long as their puppet is in office.
Hard pass.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
If Schumer allowed HR2 to go to a vote in the Senate it would pass.
He just can't afford to undercut the Obama replacement program.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
1. The bill had 2 dissenting Republican votes with Thomas Massie being one of them.
2. The bill heavily uses E-verify which is heavily disputed as a useful tool.
3. CBP agents were forced to make determinations right there and then about credible fear for asylum claims not judges. (something Brandon Judd complained about)
4. Restricting asylum between ports of entry will just force more people to try and sneak in and not being processed.
5. You can't detain people forever as we might as well build large prisons for people. I'm sure RepubliQans love that idea though.
6. You can't force a sovereign country to accept people they don't want to for long term. Sure maybe a deal here and there, but forever. Mexico will say get bent.
So why is HR 2 far superior?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)