This might mean that the other Trump cases are moot.
The Dems have only been hurting themselves through Lawfare.
It would be wiser to find a more centrist replacement for Joe.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-unanimously-for-trump-in-colorado-ballot-disqualification-dispute
You can't have the states deciding such a thing. That would open the door to abject chaos.
And 1/6 walks the line between riot and insurrection. It is not a clear case.
Mark Meadows...the participants were none other than the Proud Boys...Oath Takers...Steve Bannon...etc....some of whom eventually pleaded guilty to "Seditious Conspiracy"...Jan. 6th WAS an Insurrection...and hopefully, the SCOTUS won't stop Jack Smith from proving it BEFORE the election...and thereby justifying the 14th Amendment effort.
But he's been charged with, what? 90 some other things?
I would go further and say even if 1/6 was an insurrection, Trump's "engaging" in it, when his administration shared Intel to the House, Senate and city of Washington that this was going to happen, is questionable at best. Not to mention he twice said to make their voices "peacefully" heard.
His actions (or more accurately, his inactions) once things started are inexcusable. But that's not what's legally in question.
His advisors were begging him to do something, even send out a tweet. He refused.
He was perfectly happy to watch it happen.
Is that criminal? I don't know. But he is profoundly unfit for the office.
(no message)
(no message)
What a shit show our political parties have created.
rhaps the board libs will come to grips with the lunacy of the entire thing.
I look forward to the spin from the usual lemmings who were contorting themselves to explain the soundness of these rogue state activists.
to exclude Trump from the ballot. The fact that all three liberal justices ruled as they did should give him pause...but it won't.
It does not follow that the decisions by any state courts or secretaries of state were rendered as "rouge state activists."
Link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/23
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)