It's really puzzling why she would ask for briefs from both sides on their definition of the Presidential Records Act. When someone is on trial for armed robbery, there is no deliberation on what's considered "armed".
Just about any word in a statute can be challenged.
Does armed mean just guns and knives? Or what about if someone has mace in their purse during a robbery? Does that count as “armed” Or suppose the suspect had a plastic toy gun—-is that Armed?
Challenges to the meaning of words in laws that are not frequently before the court are not uncommon.
(no message)
(no message)
Some things are off limits. Mother jokes are for internet cowards.
You are truly pathetic.
(no message)
who was VP, there was no such protection and he stole the records.
Trump’s lawyers were making that point about the records being legally possessed and fully expected the records dept to go to court to clarify as they were in ongoing negotiations and quite perplexed as to why the records people weren’t acknowledging the law - then they raided Trump’s home in the early AM.
In Biden’s case, he had no legal standing for having the classified records and treated them with less care. Biden had more records, farmed thrm to different locations, and shared classified records with at least one unauthorized civilian (his biographer). The Biden Adm claimed their leader Biden was “cooperating” even though he was told on 4 occasions to turn over all records, and on four occasions failed to comply by withholding documents.
This case, and the others, are amazingly brazen political hit jobs using the government as a weapon and is an example of why RFK calls Biden and his people "the greatest threat to our democracy”.
based in lies and not fact. Have you read the PRA? I have...where in the Act does it say a former President can bring classified information home and make it private?
Presidential Records Act (PRA)
In 1978, Congress passed the Presidential Records Act (PRA), which states that any records created or received by the President as part of his constitutional, statutory, or ceremonial duties are the property of the United States government and will be managed by NARA at the end of the administration.
and make it private?"
Does the act say a former VP can bring classified information home and make it private?
Also, as you know and clearly don't want to acknowledge Trump is not being charged for having the records, he's being charged for fighting the government to KEEP them.
And according the several Harvard law professors, the records are clearly covered under the act from which you only quoted a small portion of the act.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
traitor Trump the dismissal. He's like flailing in the wind trying to get all these cases dismissed.
(no message)
This would apply to the NY and DC judges handling the other lawfare cases.
(no message)
(no message)
before jeopardy attaches at a trial and a dismissal is unreviewable.
If it's inexperience I'd think she'd run these decisions through mentors, colleagues.
Read the Circuit smackdown of her on the search warrant special master appointment.
(no message)
(no message)