study simply because he's building a one-family 1800 sq ft home. There must be some rational reason between what the man proposes to build and the traffic impacts leading to the fee. It can't simply be a fee determined by the town or legislature. The fee must have a rational basis.
In reality, what is happening is that Lake Tahoe doesn't want anymore homes built, which is effectively a taking of the man's property.
Ty, another one of your BS links has been debunked. The decision was UNANIMOUS. Thus, you are even to the left of the USSC's liberal extremist judges.
Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=viewall&forumid=2&msgid=171018
(no message)
(no message)
....from the attached article...
--------------------
El Dorado County released a statement to us that said, "The County is pleased with the Supreme Court's decision, which answers only a narrow question on which the parties already agreed. It explicitly leaves open the County's other strong defenses and casts no doubt on whether local governments can continue to impose reasonable permitting conditions (including impact fees) on new development under their traditional land-use authority, as the County has done here."
--------------------
Stay on this case Cole and let us know how it it all shakes out...
Link: https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/el-dorado-co-man-wins-against-the-supreme-court/
the matter for a hearing. Not too hard to understand, and it's not a surprise that you advocated for arbitrary and capricious fees, because you are to the left of Karl Marx.
...Karl Marx?...why stop there...how about Josef Stalin, or Mao Tse Tung? ;-)...good Lord, you are as they say, a piece of work ;-).
(no message)
(no message)