(no message)
charges based on a purported violation of a federal statute because he somehow knows better. And he waited until election season to do it.
(no message)
But the law doesn’t apply to the Dear Leader, right?
You support a person who banged a porn star bareback while wifey was post partum. And then paid hush money to her and tried to hide it as business expense.
The party of family values and evangelicals in 2024.
Have you no shame sir?
THIS has always been the weakest legal case against Trump AND the one that will cause the most damage to our political system because now political DA's can always use creative lawyering in jurisdictions with biased jury pools to attack candidates from the opposing party.
AND if Bragg does not get a conviction Trump benefits.
Yet the Orange DOJ prosecuted and convicted him.
They were squeezing him to turn on Trump.
Same thing being alleged here. And the Feds brought and pursued those charges under Smelly Pants.
(no message)
Bragg also argues that Trump ran afoul of a New York election law that forbids any conspiracy “to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means.” The district attorney claimed that Trump intended to violate this statute by committing fraud in order to secure his own victory in 2016.
He brought this shit on himself. Screwing whores and convincing his attorney to pay the bitch off during a presidential campaign ain’t the best idea in the world. Total dumbass, just like his voting base.
We all know what that makes you. Very surprising. Thought you knew better.
(no message)
and her family, it was a very sad day. And for America, whose president gave the go ahead to our enemy to fire on an ally. He said to keep it "within limits" (just like he told Putin before the Ukrainian Invasion by Russia that a "limited incursion" would be acceptable).
Do you think that 300 missiles is "within limits"? Think they might have been testing the Iron Dome's capabilities as Biden was taking his photo op in the ready room?
Does this story of the maiming of this little girl by one of the missiles that Iran fired after being told by Biden that it was ok bother you?
"Take the win", Biden said.
Does the satisfaction that lawfare against Trump affords your TDS help you to overlook this story?
Link: https://www.timesofisrael.com/we-have-no-shelter-says-bedouin-dad-of-girl-7-badly-hurt-by-iran-missile-shrapnel/
If Biden said that, it was a stupid statement. No, it’s not acceptable to send 300 drones/missiles. Not sure regarding the photo-op. Seems you’d have to be in the “know”. Any Israeli casualties bothers me, hence my support of Israel defending themselves.
I didn’t see the story. I’m a busy man, however, Israel and allies downed 99% of the drones/missiles launched. That’s damn effective and again, it’s a tragedy that the girl was injured.
This thread is about your hero’s trial.
Regarding Israel…I’m 100% in support of Israel defending themselves. If they decide to retaliate, I’m 100% for it. Fuck Iran.
There was no indication WCI was talking about Trump.
and Trump’s trial started today.
As far as Trump trials go, I suppose I assume the Democrats will start a new trial every week or so, at least until after the election...part and parcel to Biden's campaign effort.
(no message)
(no message)
The sad day in America was unspecified, and on the day we learn that an American president told our sworn enemy that they could fire missiles at Israel, it seems to be the greatest reason of the day for sadness (though the Banana Republic stuff with arresting the political opposition and putting him on trial with a slanted judge and jury on created charges is a reason for sadness too, I admit).
Regardless, set aside Trump for a moment if you are capable, and address the questions. If you choose not to respond, I will simply assume do not want to defend the actions but don't have the strength of character to speak out against them either.