Surprised that Cuomo said this
Replies to: Surprised that Cuomo said this
A mildly competent campaign manager Should be able to easily highlight Biden’s bs and poor policy
Just using clips like these
I’m not. He has had an axe to grind since getting kicked out as gov. for SH.
(no message)
The felony...which Michael Cohen went to prison for...was fraudulently suppressing information
that would have affected the 2016 Presidential election. In the indictment of Michael Cohen, "Individual-1" was mentioned many times, and once he pleaded guilty, the SDNY was preparing to indict "Individual-1" who everyone knew was Donald Trump...unfortunately, Trump's AG, Bill Barr, had all references to "Individual-1" stricken from the case documents, and no charges were ever filed while Trump was President...a clear case of "Lawfare".
For NY's current AG and NYC DA to bring this case forward was wholly justified.
Clinton campaign was fined by the FEC for suppressing the info that they paid for the Steele dossier
Why wasn't she charged by Bragg?
The campaign fraudulently claimed that the cost of the fictional Steele Dossier was a "legal fee". The information that this was actually a piece of opposition research was kept from the voters. Suppressed.
The FEC enforced this action against her campaign. No federal action was taken at all against the Trump campaign.
Link: https://www.axios.com/2022/03/30/fec-clinton-dnc-steele-dossier-funding
One more thing...it was the GOP that started all the 'Opposition Research' efforts vs. DJT...
...from the attached article...
------------------
A conservative website with strong ties to the Republican establishment triggered the investigation into Donald Trump’s past that ultimately produced the dossier that alleged a compromised relationship between the president and the Kremlin.
------------------
Just remember...Donald Trump welcomes assistance from arguably this nation's WORST ENEMY...Vladimir Putin, who has never wanted 'America to be GREAT"...EVER...and you want him to return to the White House?...what is wrong with you?
Link: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/website-with-gop-ties-funded-research-on-trump-dossier#:~:text=AP%20report%3A%20Website%20with%20GOP%20ties%20funded%20research%20on%20Trump%20dossier,-Politics%20Oct%2028&text=NEW%20YORK%20—%20A%20conservative%20we
"None of the parties to the DNC settlement admitted fault, NOR DID THE FEC FIND ANY."...again,
that's from your article...yet with the FOX settlement, there is a COPIOUS amount of irrefutable evidence as to their knowingly suppressed information...hence the $787M payout.
LOL
The joke's on you..."NOR DID THE FEC FIND ANY"...unlike what Dominion's attorneys found in
'Discovery'...copious amounts of evidence, which FOX knew would kill them at trial...hence the $787M payout to keep on lying to gullibles like yourself.
The two pictures are the same.
You know that, but you have this weird compulsion to be a total simp.
There's a reason for the term "False Equivalency"...yours is a prime example.
(no message)
From your linked article...
----------------
Our thought bubble via Axios' Lachlan Markay: Campaign finance reform advocates have long pointed to sub-vendor arrangements, such as the agreement between Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS, as a way campaigns can circumvent disclosure rules.
The nonprofit Campaign Legal Center sued the FEC this week over inaction on a complaint alleging the Trump campaign used sub-vendors to mask payments to Trump family members.
None of the parties to the DNC settlement admitted fault, nor did the FEC find any. Still, fines levied on high-profile political actors could spur more sub-vendor disclosure going forward.
The big picture: Trump sued Clinton last week, accusing her and dozens of others of working together to accuse him of colluding with Russia during the 2016 election.
Both the Clinton campaign and the DNC have said that they were not aware of the details of Steele's work in real-time, per CNN.
A bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report later affirmed the U.S. intelligence community's conclusion that Russia interfered in the election to help Trump defeat Clinton.
-----------------
Bottom Line...the last sentence of your article justifies the suspicions of those 51 Intel experts...
Amusing: Fox settlement with Dominion indicates guilt...BUT
Clinton campaign settlement with FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION is just some sort of administrative thing.
If you think all the sand you threw in your several replies addresses the question you are incorrect. But you don't actually think that. Just your usual simping.
Yeah, that was a great narrative they constructed.
Except for the fact they already had the laptop. Damn facts!
I've already provided the Senate Intelligence Committee Report...do yourself a favor and read it...
btw, for someone who claims to be "agnostic" as to who wins the upcoming election, you never seem to find time to criticize Trump...got a good reason for that?
Oh...and your 'laptop' bleats are as old as chewing gum on the bedpost ;-).
I am not agnostic, I despise all of it, I am sickened by the state of our "democracy".
But the sins of the last 3-1/2 years must be answered for, the lies, the corruption, the willful disregard for the health of the Republic. Biden is a joke and his handlers along with the deep state are a danger to all of us. I won't vote for Trump, but I definitely understand why people will.
You and your ilk believe that white supremacy, climate change and Trump are the greatest threats. I submit that the real threats are: debt, war and disease. And Biden is a disaster.
Still waiting for an Anti-Trump screed ;-)...
(no message)
The board has a search function, go fetch.
(no message)
From him? He’s one of the most dishonest here. Pretends to be impartial, but clearly favors the MAGA
side.
By no means is that lost on me...just a rhetorical highlight as to who he really is.
(no message)
That's the price powerful people pay.
(no message)
Why aren't we prosecuting the 51 former IC officials then?
(no message)
Maybe cause they didn’t falsify a business record, maybe the NY stature didn’t apply them? Little
things like those.
Do you expect an honest answer from Ty?
(no message)
Try to stay focused...we're talking about Trump's conviction on 34 felony counts...
given the facts of the case and the rapid finding of the 12 jurors, I'm saying the indictment of DJT was justified...and long overdue.
Care to comment on that?
"fraudulently suppressing information to affect an election" your words
Your words are hollow.
All 12 Jurors agreed with those words...in just 9 hours of deliberation.
...attached is the list of convictions, along with the following justification...
----------------
The jurors said they unanimously agreed that Trump falsified business records to conceal a $130,000 hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels to influence the outcome of the 2016 election.
---------------
Link: https://www.npr.org/2024/05/30/g-s1-1848/trump-hush-money-trial-34-counts
So, you're conceding my point again.
The rest of your argument is against Cuomo, former AG of NY, who probably knows more about this than you.
It’s the price that powerful people pay
The spotlight brings increased attention- and therefore increased responsibility.
All leaders know this.
You and Putin are in alignment on this.
(no message)
So you’re ok with political prosecutions? Part of your syllabus?
(no message)
I’m not but prominence does bring increased attention.
You think that gun charge is brought against anyone but Hunter Biden? Please.
I did not mention Hunter Biden but the gun charge was likely political. Just as dropping some of the
Tax charges against Hunter.
Or Clinton, or Spiro Agnew, etc etc etc
(no message)
This could be the dumbest thing you have ever posted. That's
saying a lot
It was vague and does not respond directly to Cuomo’s comments.
(no message)
Even when there is no crime, eh? What is the felony charge again?
(no message)