The charge of the moron brigade is led by one party.
Link: https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/health/2021/07/13/tennessee-halts-all-vaccine-outreach-minors-not-just-covid-19/7928701002/
(no message)
(no message)
Black and Hispanic people have received smaller shares of vaccinations compared to their shares of cases and compared to their shares of the total population in most states.
Link: https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/latest-data-on-covid-19-vaccinations-race-ethnicity/
(no message)
We used to criticize the Communist Party in the USSR for doing things like this.
If you support it now, would you have supported it if Trump had asked his FBI to do this?
Link: https://twitter.com/FBI/status/1414192827026878465
But then your strawman is what we should expect in any thread that puts your boy in a bad light.
(no message)
(no message)
I want to hear the details about your COVID battle.
Didn't your old handle back in the day read something like NDGD76?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Call me a racist, and you can edge out Frank and Conor for first.
Generally though, I agree it’s distasteful.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Only place I have been in lately that seems to require them are medical offices.
Be a dear and ask your bestest pal, the Red Barron if they are required by his practice in the office?
Mask are a way to feel morally and politically superior. Now that everyone who wants a vaccine has already been vaccinated, there is no reason to wear them other than to tap into that fake feeling of moral superiority. (Liberals seem to enjoy feeling moral ysuperior more than the religious right these days.)
Granted, there may be people with medical reasons who are unvaccinated, but I assume they will be wearing N-95 masks and staying away from stores and restaurants...not tooling around the grocery store in a blue medical mask or even a cloth bacteria-collector/viral-transmitter.
gracious enough to bring to our attention...in that report there are several references to the effectiveness of masks...like this one...
" Finally, the fact that face mask directives have been more effective than either lockdowns or social distancing in controlling the spread of COVID-19 (22, 33) is consistent with indoor airborne transmission as the primary driver of the global pandemic."
COVID-19 is still "alive and well" in the U.S., and over 100 million of us are unvaccinated...we have a responsibility to do all we can to defeat this deadly virus...for all our sakes.
Feel free to read the entire report...then get back to us on whether or not you still believe that mask wearing is "just political signaling"...or not, depending on your capacity for "accountability".
Link: https://www.pnas.org/content/118/17/e2018995118
reasons why then is mask wearing morally and politically superior?
Anecdotally, those i know who have medical issues have all received their shots. So I cannot image there are millions upon millions in this country balking at getting vaccinated because their physician said not to. In fact, those with health issues were given the opportunity to be first on line.
Explain the justification to give this experimental so called vaccine to the young? Do you have any studies on the long term side-effects?
How about someone with stage 4 pancreatic cancer, doc, would you recommend that person to be vaccinated?
To answer your stupid claim, I’m not a physician so I couldn’t make a judgment however to that; are there tens of millions of Americans with that affliction?
Link: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html
All fine and dandy when it's not your kid. And once again do you have a study to site the long term-effects? I'll wait straw boy
Link: https://www.aier.org/article/why-are-we-vaccinating-children-against-covid-19/
I'll let you know if you're right or wrong.
you admitted that you are a half-wit so that explains a lot about you. Once again I ask for you to site a study. Still waiting.
Now try and answer my question to you.
Jimmy it's best just to stay on the canvas after a beat down. You never seem to learn that lesson.
mutation. Masking is stupid but harmless. Do ask the Baron for me.
You can't say there are not legitimate reasons to not take an experimental vaccine when the pressure on the medical system is reduced, and symptoms could well be less than side effects. I decided the risk of the vaccine was worth it, but people can legitimately disagree with me on that. Not so with the science of masks. Most of the people wearing them at this point are pure partisans, which is what Chris94 was lamenting with his original post. You can downplay the mask thing, but my point remains germane to Chris94's first post.
getting approved shortly. You agree that when it has full approval, it should be taken?
There are also clear costs to our system and potentially to public health in not getting it.
Again, there is zero such cost to masking, it harms no one.
Baron and I have mutually agreed to ignore each other. He is civilized in that way.
I don't think that is right, but I look forward to a link from you on that.
(no message)
I agree when it is fully approved, the reasons for not taking it diminish almost totally. Then again, the approval can't be political...and everything that the government does is political these days.
and it clearly says that full approval is coming shortly.
(no message)
and Guillan-Barre'.
It is probably not enough to worry most, but I do think many really worry about the vax being rushed....That is not politics.
And no, i am not in that group, but I do acknowledge their concern.
You're killing people!
Hey, did you hear the latest abortion joke?
(no message)
Maybe you should ask your pseudo science buddies to look into the possibility that anti-Vaxxers are genetically inferior.
(no message)
(no message)
perpetuate this disease.
So, do you deny it?
Now for the Wiscy shuffle.
You really don't recognize how you needlessly embarrass yourself here?
Spend a little more time thinking before you post.
When you start with your insults I know your goose is cooked.
Again answer the question, do you support those not vaxxing other than for a legit medical reason? Yes or no?
As Chris would say, don't be a coward. Quote it. You'll look less silly admitting that you made that up then continuing with your usual nonsense.
You have been implying it by your repeated criticism of those who are calling those people out. As they should be.
Stop playing dumb and the martyr. Your game is old.
I have never even implied anything of the sort. I'm immunized and I wasn't required to get it. About the only thing I said about immunizations at the beginning was how appalled I was at twentysomethings with no health concerns getting it before some of the elderly. That was repulsive. AOC was one of those selfish bastards, as I recall.
Immunizing your ten-year old seems to be quite unnecessary.
Mostly, I've mocked the people out there in their twenties and thirties, and even beyond, who are immunized and wear their masks everywhere: when they're alone, when they're outside in the park, and we've gotten to the point where all of us are supposed to be at the mercy of the most neurotic, most irrational people in existence, trying to make them feel comfortable. As with much or most of the madness going on now, it traces back to the rise of women to positions of authority. They tend to be much more safety-centric in everything and, contrary to the predictions and stereotypes, tend to have a greater propensity for authoritarian-type measures. If you actually look historically at female political leaders, you will see this, as well. Even in the cyber world, those websites that still have moderated comments sections feature females most of the time, there to police language, expel people, protect hurt feelings, and make the joints "safe."
There are consequences to actions, even those that seem so righteous at the time. People thought that the rise of women to positions of authority would drive greater consensus among individuals and groups, would deradicalize us to a greater extent, would take into account the voices of the many, and generally produce more harmony. The opposite happened. Many of the most radical politicians we have are women. We've become more divided, and think about the rhetoric on the opposite poles and how many times females have driven that language. You will find a lesser percentage of female members of Congress in the middle, proportionally, than men. Think about who drives our culture's therapeutic lexicon, omnipresent psychobabble, and think about who usually catastrophizes with the greatest frequency. Who milked January 6th with talk of PTSD as a "survivor?" Who is usually more likely to prioritize "safety" over freedom? Yeah.
Now, back to your lying. Quote it.
You have constantly been criticizing anyone who has the temerity to call out the idjits that won’t get the vaccine.
And then you get indignant when you are asked whether you support them not getting it. It then takes you three bloviation paragraphs to answer a simple question of whether you support the refusalists. If you don’t, then your criticism of those calling out the refusalists is nonsensical.
You are truly a sick pup. I feel sorry for you.