Merely having that relationship between Democrats and the companies that banned him is going to have traction.
Dems are suggesting who to ban…..hmmm.
I sure hope so.
If only I could bet the other side of this one like I did your and MAS's election predictions, I'd get another ski place.
It's also funny to see a bunch of old people seemingly have no idea what "flagging" means.
Come on Lance, you can’t hold that inferiority complex grudge against me forever.
The racism that causes few black folks to ski.
I’ve seen a lot of these privileged dos and they are damning! But…. counsel for Silicon Valley has the procedural tools to delay their production for a long long time
Tell us, do you think President Trump wants to produce documentation and talk about what he actually had to do with the events leading up to the events at the Capitol?
is it that's giving me pause in accepting your premise?...you are nothing if not persistent...keep going, Baron...this should get more and more 'curiouser' ;-).
There is no legislation passed and signed, and talk is cheap. But it does provide an excellent motivator for FB, now doesn’t it?
I don’t know what will happen, I was just offering the thought. But your absolute insistence that such a thing could never happen is that of a single-minded zealot. And your persistent claim that Anti-Trust legislation is evidence that it won’t is absurd - first because congress has been talking about this for years, yet the tech oligarchs persist, and second because if such legislation has a legit i chance to pass, it is more likely to motivate cooperation from FB win the Biden WH than rebellion.
I know I'll be bringing the subject up to my Congressman at Town Hall and personal meetings (along with support for a new energy policy that includes grid-level nuclear power).
BTW, the anti-trust legislation initiative vs "Big Tech" (incl. Amazon as well as FB) is very much a bi-partisan effort...I'd wager that it will get voted on.
