Harris and Walz to sit for joint interview. Jesus, she is incompetent. Laughable.
You don’t have to vote Trump, but if you support Harris, you truly hate this country.
Link: Walk the security blanket
Replies to: Harris and Walz to sit for joint interview. Jesus, she is incompetent. Laughable.
The fix is in. Taped interview not live. CNN will edit out all the word salad and incompetence out
(no message)
She'll be asked hard-hitting questions about yellow school buses and Venn Diagrams.
(no message)
She must be going through DTs or an utter dunce
(no message)
They’re being interviewed by a republican so, what’s the complaint?
(no message)
“The shooter was a Republican”.
(no message)
Oh brilliant!
(no message)
Even mush for brains Joe sat alone for an interview.
(no message)
That she's too dumb (and loaded) to handle an interview by herself. Naturally, if Trump had insisted
on having Pence sit in on his interviews with him in 2016 and 2020, you would've said, "What's the big deal?" right?
On the plus side, this whole spectacle will succeed in reducing the prestige of DEI even further.
or they’re doing their interview and not yours.
They have a very short runway until November. Maybe they’re condensing opportunities.
She’s been attorney general of California so it’s probably your issue not hers.
Her handlers are attempting to run out the clock. She's been the candidate for five weeks.
Her campaign has only agreed to any kind of interview because MSM figures sympathetic to Dems have even started saying that she really ought to, ya know, answer questions from the press and the people, 'cuz, democracy and all.
Walz is apparently the brains of the outfit. We're in good hands.
(no message)
Every time I see that dope on stage hamming it up, I think how our enemies are shaking.
(no message)
Ah, weird and creepy JD is your choice?
(no message)
No, Jim, I thought he was a poor choice. I said that if Trump wanted a young VP, Vivek was a much
better choice. I can post a dozen videos of Vivek talking with communist protesters where he manages to pacify them and coax them into semi-rational discussion. He's smoother in front of all audiences, and he has business bona fides. I also would've picked Burgum over Vance because of his business experience, which would have focused the campaign more on economics, which is always at the top of the list of voters. I'm guessing that part of the reason for picking Vance was Ohio, but I think Trump would carry it regardless who he picked.
As for "weirdness," it more than a bit odd to have lied about as many things in his background as Walz has lied. I guess like Joey, he is just a very insecure guy. Not very smart, either. Did he really think people wouldn't quickly check his military claims from over the years?
Yeah, Vivek Isn’t weird at all. Eye roll!
(no message)
Everyone you don't like is "weird!" Amazing!
Any chance that you yourself might be a tad "weird," Jim?
Or, you just chose 2 very weird people.
(no message)
Could be, but I don't think so. Call it a hunch.
The fact that people mindlessly repeat a line spoon-fed to them without questioning it, in this case, labeling political opponents "weird," is unsurprising, but nevertheless dispiriting.
Weirdos like other weirdos.
(no message)